Cool Pic
 

Saw this on anther forum, and thought it was too good to not share it....





[IMG]local://upfiles/27/4FA80865FD4742D1A986C694330AF2B0.jpg[/IMG]

RE: Cool Pic
 

Wow, how crazy would that be.

RE: Cool Pic
 

Looks like the wheels lifted it up, and the rotation of the engine was trying to twist it over (how's it looks like it's on the one rear driver side wheel with the appearance that the passenger side rear wheel is off the ground).

RE: Cool Pic
 

Can't do that with a Hybrid :D

RE: Cool Pic
 

Reminds me of the old HEMI Under Glass Wheel-Standers.

RE: Cool Pic
 

And thats the reason I lose traction when I get on it. Would'nt want to mess up my back bumper:D

RE: Cool Pic
 

LOL! Good find, thanks for posting it. I would think that would do a real number on the front suspension as well. I think that car would benefit from AWD if it had been an option. Oh well, still fun to see regardless.

RE: Cool Pic
 

Nice pic.:)

RE: Cool Pic
 

is that an old 67-69 cuda?

RE: Cool Pic
 

the car says on it 1964, so if that is true I would say no.

RE: Cool Pic
 

That car is not from 1964. That is a 69' Barracuda.

RE: Cool Pic
 

From the lack of side marker lights, I'd say it was a '67.

RE: Cool Pic
 

I don't think that number is a year. It's definitely NOT a '64 Barracuda, which was one of the ugliest cars ever built with it fishbowl rear window.



[IMG]local://upfiles/148/40F2BD26CEE242259DAFB98265E92375.jpg[/IMG]

RE: Cool Pic
 

I know it isn't a 1964 Barrcuda, that car stands out in a crowd and not in a good way, the thing that confuses me though is if it is a 1967 Cuda, then why does it have 1964 listed on the windows? Is it some kind of special meeting or is it by coincidence that it got a racing number that one would think was a year.

RE: Cool Pic
 

I think it's just a coincidence. Sometimes, we all try to read too much into stuff. :D

RE: Cool Pic
 

Hey, lay off the 64-66 Barracuda. They may not have been the beautiful E-Body’s, but every car had a humble beginning.

I still don't think that is a 67, in 67 it was still more of a fastback look, the back window went back a lot farther. in 69 they moved away from the fast back look and the deck lid increased in size.

I'd almost guarantee that is a 69. I'm at work so I can't look it up though.

RLSH, I'd say it's just dumb luck that the racing number is 1964

RE: Cool Pic
 

You're probably right about that.

66Cuda, I apologize. I didn't mean to offend you.

RE: Cool Pic
 

Lack of side markers would indicate '67. Plymouth Barracudas shared body style in years 1967 through 1969. This example is just the notchback version... not the fastback. Fastback and notchback versions were available all three model years. Major body change to e-body in 1970 marked the begining of the short deck.

RE: Cool Pic
 

great pick i remember seeing the 70 charger from the fast and the furious pull a wheelie

RE: Cool Pic
 

I'll have to look into this, I can't ever remember seeing a 67 notchback and I have seen a lot of A-body Cuda's having owned one. Not saying your wrong, I'm just not sure.

RLSH, no offence taken.

RE: Cool Pic
 

Well my dad set it as his desktop Wallpaper. Hooorah!!!! My dad ordered the parts we need for the Vette. We neeed to pull the dash out and put new lkights in and a couple other things. And then it's on to the real Muscle car of the family. [sm=happy046.gif][sm=happy046.gif][sm=happy046.gif][sm=happy046.gif][sm=happy046.gif]

RE: Cool Pic
 

From allpar.com: