Notices
General Dodge Challenger Discussions Discuss anything related to the new Dodge Challenger within...

SRT v. RT

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-19-2007, 12:56 PM
  #11  
Super Moderator
 
Jeremiah 29:11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SRT v. RT

I think superchargers are great, but they put a parasitic power drain (and lower MPG) on the engine and such a huge shock on the powertrain that it really
wears your car out.

I think the new dual turbochargers are certainly a good option for the street as they have very little lag due to lower mass material technology.
I do like the rear turbochargers that seem promising, plus it gives you more engine room.
__________________
For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Then you will call upon me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.
Old 07-19-2007, 02:23 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
73Cuda340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SRT v. RT

I suppose it really doesn't matter to some, but for me, I would like to get the biggest baddest engine possible. As for features, I doubt there will be any features worth spending an extra 2K? ,4K, 6K more for? 8^) What maybe a DVD player for the kids while you set a new land speed record? 8^) I suppose the only thing worth the SRT-8 will be paint, decal and hood options, and possibly brakes and wheels. - Is that enough? For some maybe. Personally, I am torn, I want a low production number first year run, but I also do not want to pay MSRP or more and I want and SRT-8. Why? I want all the decals, hoods and other related things that could possibly come on the SRT-8, but I don't want to spend thousands more for them - there has to be a solution to this SRT vs RT thing - I guess it is all in our heads.

My head is starting to hurt from waiting - I want to see the options available

-Phil
Old 07-19-2007, 10:18 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
davecpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SRT v. RT

for me 425 horses is more than enough. I was checking out the camaro forum and noticed there is a rumor that a supercharged 550hp camaro with a roots-style blower is coming out. But the funny thing is that many people on the camaro forum think the new camaro looks like crappola.
Old 07-20-2007, 05:16 PM
  #14  
Super Moderator
 
Jeremiah 29:11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SRT v. RT

I think the Camaro in the movie look good and it was the better choice since the car looks futuristic which is bad for us guys who like the retro look which
the Challenger has more of.
__________________
For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Then you will call upon me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.
Old 08-03-2007, 03:56 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
PVOMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SRT v. RT

srt = 6.4 v

ho indy = 6.9
Old 08-03-2007, 03:58 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
PVOMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SRT v. RT

srt = sema 07
Old 08-07-2007, 12:34 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
georgejetson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SRT v. RT


ORIGINAL: PVOMan

srt = 6.4 v

ho indy = 6.9
It's funny how one of the best-wired sources in all of Mopar-land keeps posting this stuff and you guys keep ignoring him.

Guys, 6.9 liters is 426 ci. Wake up, y'all.
Old 08-07-2007, 02:30 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Yankee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SRT v. RT


ORIGINAL: georgejetson
Guys, 6.9 liters is 426 ci. Wake up, y'all.
Close, it's actually 7 liters.
Old 08-07-2007, 03:24 PM
  #19  
Junior Member
 
georgejetson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SRT v. RT


ORIGINAL: Yankee


ORIGINAL: georgejetson
Guys, 6.9 liters is 426 ci. Wake up, y'all.
Close, it's actually 7 liters.
6.985, actually. But they won't call it a 7 liter because "everyone knows" a 7 liter is a 427.
Old 08-07-2007, 03:43 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Paladin06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: East Valley AZ
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: SRT v. RT

My MoPar magazine says the 6.1 is the 426..


Quick Reply: SRT v. RT



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:01 PM.