View Single Post
Old 03-09-2007, 11:36 PM
  #4  
RLSH700
Super Moderator
 
RLSH700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 1978-1983 Challenger

Your very welcome themitsuman. I also thought the '69 Daytona's were neat.

I'm glad to hear you've had good luck with your 2.6L. Unfortuneatly most of the people I have known that had the 2.6L did have those problems at low mileage. Glad to hear this isn't the case on your Challenger.

I can image that the 1600 would have a serious lack in power. It does seem crazy how the older cars so often get the garage; meanwhile, the new ones get weathered on. It seems illogical but that is how it happens. So what are your newer cars?

I liked the Charger as soon as it came out, I just wish they would have called it the Coronet instead or something different anyways. I also wish they would have used the original concept styling as well, but I am partial to the LH styling.

I believe the new Challenger will get the concept interior or at least similar to the concept interior. I don't think you have to worry about that.

I look forward to discussing about the Challenger in the other sections. If you have any questions, feel free to PM me.

[IMG]local://upfiles/22/7EB7CACEEFC74591A8314933FF3FD44D.jpg[/IMG]
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006

College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing

The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts