Well I'm in total agreement with AWSURE. Am I missing something here? Are we not paying for the interior? To say I don't care about it makes no sense to me at all. [&:]
I have always weighed the interior design and comfort into my buy or don't buy decision. If I don't like the entire package it does not go home to my drive way and draw money from my checking account. I'd look rather silly saying to my wife, friends and family or at my next car show, I sure love this new Challenger but, don't look at the interior because it stinks and looks just like a Charger.
I'm not taking any cheap shots here but please, it's all part of the experience and it's not free..
ORIGINAL: awsure
You know what...I CARE! I have to ride in it & frankly I cannot see the outside of the car when I am behind the wheel. I want the entire experience that the concept promises...not a Charger with a two door shell dropped on it.
Why should it OF COURSE look like a Charger interior? Why shouldn't it follow the concept interior closely? Your premises on these points makes no sense. If we followed that logic throughout then OF COURSE the Challenger should be a four door or OF COURSE the Challenger should have the Charger hood or the A-line should get the squished hump of the Charger rather than follow the line inspired by the 70 Challenger.
It is not all about the exterior for all of us and while you can hold that opinion MANY of us do not share your view. I, for one, am animated about the interior because I REALLY, REALLY, love what the concept promised. I would PAY $$ for it but I cannot because it was left in the design studio for the creative guys to wax eloquent about the cool masculine themes they integrated.
I do not mean to sound insulting. I am just responding to your points with some passion.