View Single Post
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 09:21 AM
  #75  
Axel's Avatar
Axel
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: INTERIOR PICS!!

Whiteheat, I'm not saying that the Camaro is ugly, I'm not saying the Charger is ugly, I like both cars and would probably have had a Charger had they decided to put a stick in the thing, but just because of that I went with the Mustang. What I'm upset about is the fact that they take iconic names and try to cash in on them. The Charger hasn't been a Charger since it was first released and through that era and the same goes for the Camaro. This is not a Camaro and should not carry the name. Neither should have any of the Mustangs that came after 69 and early 70s.

Let me try again with the interior. From what I understand the interior, for the majority of it, is made by an ourside manufacturer correct? So if they make the interior out of the same cheap junk that they have in it now, is there some reason that it would actually cost more? Is there somewhere in the assembly line where this will actually lose them money? Does the company charge them for different molds? Are they going to lose money when they redesign the Charger? I'm asking because I'm not sure how this whole process takes place. Until this bankrupt thing with their plastic parts company, I thought it was all actually made in house.
Reply