I don't find the interior to be hideous by any means. It ain't a Bentley, but then again, it ain't a Bentley; it's a revisionist muscle car. Is it radically differently from a Charger? No, but they designed this Charger as a revisionist muscle car also, they just fudged up, threw some practical thinking in there in the form of two too many doors and no manual, and surprise, many resented it. Now, are you going to this car as bad due to a biased perception of the Charger? I don't know; I've read "I don't like it" but I'm not seeing a whole bunch of "why, I don't like it".
Not a dare, not a confrontation, an honest solicitation of "why"
its horrendous..interior design is part of the reason
what exactly is so horrendous about the interior ? I'm not going saying you're wrong, I'm just used to practical cars. I've ridden in Accura TL's, BMW's, Audis, Avalon's, Lexus's, Cadillacs, etc. I don't see anything particularly egregious about this interior.
With that inquiry put forward, I posted earlier today on Redletter and inquired from Nardelli and Press, is the interior on the Challenger what they wanted with improved interiors. Haven't heard back yet. Good thing I can type with my breath held.