View Single Post
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 06:55 PM
  #14  
MrKrisSullivan's Avatar
MrKrisSullivan
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Interesting Proposition

Ok mirada maybe your right. Maybe. The times i've seen for the manual are 4.6 and 4.8 for auto. SRT times are in the low 5's like 5.2 and 5.3 for auto's so let's say i gave you a half second with a manual which is out of this world your still coming up short of the auto LS2. Yeah im sure there not easy to launch i've read a bunch on the traction control also though. Wouldn't that help a lot. Your manual SRT isn't gonna run better than 4.6 well driven either and you know it. Probably gonna be closer to 4.8.
I'll bet the whole chicken coupe that a LS2 GTO will take any SRT sedan. The Challenger on the other hand is another argument but's it's also another 12k so what. This is so bias it's ludacris man.
"you know several GTO owners" ok so where are the several Challenger owners you know??? That's the statement im talking about im just arguing numbers brother facts don't lie man. We've all read the "low 5 sec" review for the SRT Challenger auto. Do you think the mags are bias?? Do you not understand the point im makeing? Or are you fustrated I have a point?? Do you think those mags are b.s. but the Challenger is a different story?? this is becoming really confusing if you can feel me at all.
Reply