View Single Post
Old 05-12-2008, 07:07 AM
  #4  
DSkippy
Super Moderator
 
DSkippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Top Gear Review

We were hitting almost 130mph on the entrance to the monstrous Turn 8, but the 4,000lb+ Challenger was happy to take the abuse for as long as we cared to hand it out. If you tried to do that in most production Mustangs, they'd still be picking up the pieces in a year. It's not that the Mustang's not huge fun - it is. It's just that the Challenger is miles better.
Well, it ain't poetry, but it is music to one's ears.....

It's not that the Mustang's not huge fun - it is. It's just that the Challenger is miles better.

ahhhh

It's not that the Mustang's not huge fun - it is. It's just that the Challenger is miles better.

yeahhhhh


So we have learned to wait and let the reviewers do their deal before we jump the gun with baseless complaints.
Lear, that is SO true. Everyone throwing out claptrap, on cold stats and this and that, w/o remember a good car is more than the sum of its parts, a good car, can be automotively synergistic and have an essence that transcends its components...

A master tailor can take the same wool fabric a sweatshop takes and create a work of art in lieu of an "off the rack" suit and it sounds like the SRT team did just that. I'm not implying that the R/T will not be as inspirational, I am comparing this mopar product to the producers of non-mopar cars.


__________________
º¿º
~) 69.5 SuperBee