No I'm not, The kits will be intercoolered with air/water units for longevity and insurance in the heat.
As for the why S/C and not turbos, The way I would veiw it is they see a bigger potential market for the boosted Challenger customer rather than they did for the 300 series. I still believe the choice between S/C and turbos is made for packaging reasons.
ORIGINAL: npeifer
ORIGINAL: mjorgensen
The supercharger is generally chosen over a turbo on a V8 because of packaging constraints and or money. The turbo can make more power in general because it works off free power, no engine power used to run it so pound for pound the turbo makes more in the end. The supercharger is easier to install, may or may not need intercooling that is a must have in a turbo car so the plumbing is much simpler.
The 6.1L will only take 5.5 to 6 pounds of boost in stock form anyway so a turbo would seem to be overkill anyway for such a low number. The supercharger may not even NEED to have intercooling at these levels.
Hope this helped!
The
ORIGINAL: Jeremiah 29:11
So let me open up a can of worms.
Why a supercharger vs. a turbocharge specifically for the Challenger. What is it about the Challenger that the Supercharger is being offered.
I am more interested in the technical vs. the marketing reasons but I would love to hear both.
Hold on, you are offering a supercharger kit and have released an MSRP for a kit and you don't know for SURE if it NEEDS intercooling ?