View Single Post
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 06:25 AM
  #122  
Riptide's Avatar
Riptide
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: R/T vs GT vs GTO

This must be some sort of joke yes? Because it made me chuckle. Good one!

You are the last one who should be levying criticism for flaming. Practically everything you post is troll. And your assessment of my alleged "fanboyism" is a complete joke. Talk about pot, kettle, black Mr. "Mopar or nopar".

I am one of the only posters in this "debate" thread that has bothered to post a single link. I have posted two of my own and then discussed the motortrend article. The OP itself is the result from some race posted in another forum. I responded in kind with one of my own "fairy tales" as someone so artfully put it. Then the flames began in earnest.

I'm done with this thread. The fact is the R/T isn't much if any faster than a stock GT. That is reality. While we're on the subject of facts you can easily mod a GT to hang right there and in fact beat an SRT8 while saving lots of money. You don't like it that's just tough. I like the Challenger and would love to have one alongside my other cars. Whether you believe me or not is probably another story but I honestly don't care. I looked into getting a Challenger last month from Hood River Dodge but could not afford it. Perhaps down the road no pun intended.


ORIGINAL: mopar2ya

Hard to respect someone and thier opinion with a bunch of name calling and derrogatory flaming though... I am sure you would have to agree. [sm=forgetit.gif]
Reply