HAHAHA That's awesome! Kowalski is the man!!!

Anyway, I just don't understand the variance in the performance times. I could see if it was a measley 0.1 or 0.2 seconds difference (between every article I've ever read on the R/T and what posters on this forum are CLAIMING). If that was teh case I wouldn't be concerned one bit. But it just doesn't add up for me!

Maybe I'm naive, but I just don't understand how a Test Driver for a widely respected automotive publication such as Road & Track gets 6.2 seconds 0-60 in his R/T and others on here claim more like 5.2. Obviously the guy with Road & Track knows how to drive a car and push its limits. Can you understand why I'm confused now?