I agree with you 100% Albeeno. I'm not saying that I don't like the outside of the Mustang, I love it, I just like the Challenger better. R/T speeds are comparable, which is disappointing giving it has more power, but that's all I really want. That 0-60 time for when I get on that highway. The interior really diappointed me, but they made it a little better before they brought it out. Not what I wanted it, but a little better. I'm still looking into getting that Ram steering wheel in it, or an aftermarket, but we'll see about that with the cost and such.

Yes, the interior of the Mustang is better, in my opinion, then the Challenger, but I like the looks of the outside better. And, as you said, the 2010 Mustang is a disappointment overall. I did expect more when it came to the engine, at least what Dodge has been doing with the Hemi, but only 15? Ouch. And, as you said, 400 N/A is more impressive, and cheaper, then 400 from a S/C. If I had the money then I may think about it, but unfortunately I don't. At least I can say that I owned a good looking car, two of them, Challenger and Mustang, though the Challenger is questionnable now with the auto industry woes. Who knows if I will see my car.