I happened to run across this and wanted to share it. It's nice to see when the media actually admits when they are wrong. I would motion that they should do this more often in fact.
http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/auto...motive-history
The funny thing is I mentioned several of these vehicles in a past point saying that just because something does well in a magazine comparison doesn't mean it will be successful, or that it is in fact a good offering, and I remember being criticized for the list that I provided which resembles this list.
The funny thing is take a look at the how the list tallies up.
Renault: 1
Ford: 5
GM: 4
Chrysler: 0
Do I detect a basis in the automotive press?