View Single Post
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 05:42 PM
  #4  
RLSH700's Avatar
RLSH700
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Manual vs. Automatic


ORIGINAL: RoswellGrey

For three years in the early '70s, I was half-owner of a '68 Coronet R/T with a 440 Magnum and 3-speed automatic. What that car did on the streets went a LONG way toward financing my college education. (Yeah, including blowing away a couple Hemi Challengers. In the actual Muscle Car Era, those engines weren't regarded all that highly on the streets. Overall, the 440 was far superior.) Personally, I've never owned anything but an automatic since.
I believe that had the 727 automatic in it. The 727 was described as being able to shift faster than some people could with manuals. The problem is that some of the newer automatics haven't been quite as good about this.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006

College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing

The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts

Reply