Well with all due respect, you can look at this in one of two ways. You can look at the possibility that he has a family that has done things that has made us our enemy and should carry that status on top of ripping off an education at our expense, or you can look at it this way. He choose a better life for himself that included getting away from the ways of his parents. Yes, he has an education at our expense, but unlike thousands of "professional college students" or civilian Gov't employees who don't ask but instead demand what their country can do for them get a bunch of degrees in subjects that they don't need to fulfill their duties just to one up each other and in some cases can get off of working for to go full time while having tuition paid for AND get full pay at the same time just to do basic office work meanwhile the people risking their lives to maintain our freedom get paid next to nothing, this person is repaying the tax payers by becoming a valuable taxpayer himself by creating wealth AND providing the country with a car that they will love and adore.

I don't believe people should be judged because of who their parents are because many times the children are very much unlike their parents and that can be good or bad. There are cases in history that we know of like in the case of royal families and in family dominated companies like Ford and Anheuser-Busch where the brats of a good leader run the country or company into the ground, but the United States by definition is a country of opportunity still and many people who were previously persecuted or from a poor background have become rich and successful. My theory is let each person prove themselves. Don't expect that just because someone shares the same last name as someone else that they are the same person and will have the same impact on the world.