I guess it depends if you like road handling or the drag strip. For me I welcome the IRS but I know some of you like the live axle.

American Dream: We drive the Interceptor, the full-size sedan that could save Ford

Mission: Possible.

A modern rear-drive sedan from Ford? Here's how - and why.


By Angus MacKenzie
Photography by Wesley Allison
Press the electrically triggered chrome door handle and the door pops open. The sculpted one-piece leather seats are as stiff as the suspension, and you slide onto them as into a Barcelona chair. A 21st-century "shaker" looms in your view, and the rest of the hood is long and upright...you're overlooking a similar expanse of sheetmetal as in a Chrysler 300. Hit the electronic ignition button on the headliner just aft of the header, and the 5.4-liter V-8 fires up with a rumble.



The clutch is a bit heavier than a Mustang GT's, but it releases smoothly and progressively. This big sedan is easy to drive-if you're into low-riders. It bounces along the smooth test road like a candy-colored 1964 Impala on the haunches of its hydraulics. It feels like one good bump could launch it into the air. You shift cleanly into second gear, but that's all she'll show today.

Interceptor. It's just another Ford concept car. A nice piece of eye candy designed to take your attention away from the real horror story playing out in Dearborn amid collapsing sales, massive losses, and a demoralized workforce. Don't you believe it: Even as you read this, Dearborn insiders are sweating the details on a secret plan to radically change the way FoMoCo develops new cars and trucks. And the Interceptor reveals a key part of that plan.

Two things make the Interceptor important: the way it looks and the way it drives. Especially the way it drives. Ignore the fact the Interceptor rolls on a cobbled-together Mustang platform with a nonexistent show-car suspension. It's the thinking behind the car that matters. And the thinking is this: Ford wants an all-new rear-drive sedan for North America by 2011 or 2012.



Not that long ago, rear drive was on life support at Ford. The company had axed the slow-selling Lincoln LS sedan and Ford Thunderbird, both built on the expensive DEW98 platform shared with the Jaguar S-Type, and announced the plants building the Lincoln Town Car, Mercury Grand, Marquis, and Ford Crown Victoria would be closed in 2010. Under this scenario (Motor Trend, August 2006), the Mustang would be the only rear-drive Ford car on sale in America by 2011.

Now, under new CEO Alan Mulally, Ford is rethinking rear drive for North America. Insiders say Mulally has looked at what GM has done to reinvent Cadillac, seen the buzz it's generated around new rear-drive cars like the Chevy Camaro, Pontiac G8, and the Chinese-market Buick Park Avenue (all based on the Australian-developed Zeta rear-drive architecture), and asked: "Why can't we do that?"



It's more than just an obvious question. It also addresses a major dilemma for two key Ford products, the Mustang and Ford Australia's Falcon. The Mustang has been a runaway hit for Ford, but by 2011 the platform will have been in production for seven years, and its live rear axle is no match for the sophisticated independent rearends under the newer Camaro and Dodge Challenger. Down in Australia, the Falcon, Ford's rear-drive rival to GM's Holden Commodore, is getting a major overhaul for 2008, but its platform dates back to 1998.

Neither platform has the volume (2006 sales totaled 160,000 Mustangs and 50,000 Falcons and variants) to justify an all-new replacement each. So Mulally has asked for a plan to bring Ford's rear-drive cars together onto a single, global vehicle architecture. That means Mustang and Falcon. And it also means potential replacements for the Lincoln Town Car, Mercury Grand Marquis, and Ford Crown Victoria. Which is w

 

Not in my driveway and certainly not in my garage..[:'(]

 

Yeah, that thing is not the greatest looking vehicle.

 

[sm=smiley21.gif][sm=smiley21.gif][sm=smiley11.gif][sm=smiley11.gif]

 

its worse in person.

 

That Front end is Hideous, Ford is going a different way in the future alright straight into the ground.

 

That it is! I saw one at the K.C. autoshow and it was one of the ugliest cars there.[:'(][:'(][:'(] Why don't they learn from Ford of Australia and use some of their styling cues. The Falcon is a nice looking car, why can't they use the styling from it and give it to the Interceptor. Part of what Ford fails to understand is they have three divisions competiting in the same segment, upscale image to luxury. What they need is a performance division. Chrysler has Dodge, GM has Pontiac, and Ford has nothing because they keep trying to pass Ford off as being a premium brand which has no performance besides the Mustang and one car does not define a whole division. The Fusion is the slowest domestic mid-sized sedan currently, the Five Hundred can't compete against the Grand Prix in either the supercharged version nor the V8 version due to the fact that it has the weak 3.0L Duratech that was unupdated since 1996 (the 3hp & 7ft-lbs of torque boost is not worth counting as an update). Even though it has a 6-speed, that only covers the weight increase of the Five Hundred over the Taurus and improves the fuel economy. Heck the Charger completely blows it out of the water with either HEMI option. The G6 and the Avenger both offer better acceleration than the Fusion by a note worthy amount do to the fact that both of them offer more hp & tq since they were willing to offer a larger engine as well as a 6-speed automatic. The Focus has never offered anything that could match either the Neon SRT-4 or the Cobalt SS/Ion Red Line. The Crown Vic also is extremely outdated and cannot hold a candle to the Charger's performance.

10-15 years ago, Ford actually offered some noteworthy performance. The pre-1996 Taurus SHO was one of the fastest non-luxury mid-sized cars in the market. The 1989-1995 Thunderbird SC was quite noteworthy interms of performance for its day. The Probe GT had note worthy performance for its day for a mid-sized coupe. After this the performance just started to die.

The F-150 doesn't have a V8 that can match the acceleration of the HEMI or GM's V8s before they were updated in the latest version. They need to inject their cars with Red Bull and quite making such a boring line and quite using so much chrome. A little is good for an accent but all models having that much is redicilous.