So that is what SS stands for.
2006 SEMA Show
Dodge Challenger Super Stock
What is it?
Dodge Challenger Super Stock
What's special about it?
One of only two Dodge Challenger concept bodies built, the Dodge Challenger Super Stock is designed to commemorate the legacy of the 392 Hemi. With the introduction of the Super Stock concept, Chrysler also announced the release of the 392 Hemi crate motor, available with either fuel-injected or carbureted induction.
The 6.4-liter fuel-injected Hemi in the Super Stock concept utilizes 10.5:1 compression, twin-plug cylinder heads, forged pistons, a forged crankshaft and forged connecting rods to generate 525 horsepower and 510 pound-feet of torque. The engine is available completely assembled, with a plug-and-play wiring harness.
Skunkworks engineers, the in-house group of enthusiasts responsible for many Chrysler concept cars and performance parts, made significant changes to the LX platform on which both the original Challenger concept and the production car are based to create the Super Stock. Most significant is the absence of the platform's independent rear suspension. A live axle, complete with — get this — leaf springs, is utilized to reduce wheel hop and improve straight-line performance. A set of Mark Williams axles improves the rear end's durability. American Racing wheels and Goodyear slicks put power to the ground.
Ralph Gillies, DaimlerChrysler's vice president of design, told us the car would likely be capable of high 9- or low 10-second quarter-mile times. Based on the way it shook the rafters in the Las Vegas Convention Center's South Hall when a DCX official brought the Hemi to life, we believe him.
What's Edmunds' take?
Even though the paint scheme on the Super Stock concept emulates the colors used by the Sox and Martin race team on its Super Stock Plymouth Barracudas back in 1970 (Dick Landy raced Dodge Challengers), we can't deny this car embodies the spirit of the original Super Stock drag-racing class. At the very least it's proof that the minds at Mopar eat, drink and sleep gasoline and burnouts. And that's something we can respect. — Josh Jacquot
__________________
For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Then you will call upon me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.
For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Then you will call upon me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.
something isnt right in the numbers here..
the challenger concept weighs 4160lbs. i would assume that this one is lighter, but how much lighter could it really be? it has 540bhp...assuming a drivetrain loss of 18%, that would put about 442 to the wheels. with that amount of whp, the car would need to weigh about 2250lbs to break into the high 9s. granted, i am using a "track calculator" which doesnt account for all factors such as gearing and altitude, but the bottom line is that 540bhp isnt going to put a 4100lb car any where near the 9s. these writers who "believe him", probably havent ever been to a track, or turned a wrench on a drag car to know what is actually needed to run in the 9s. curt george's challenger ran low 9s, and he had something like 1100hp...
the challenger concept weighs 4160lbs. i would assume that this one is lighter, but how much lighter could it really be? it has 540bhp...assuming a drivetrain loss of 18%, that would put about 442 to the wheels. with that amount of whp, the car would need to weigh about 2250lbs to break into the high 9s. granted, i am using a "track calculator" which doesnt account for all factors such as gearing and altitude, but the bottom line is that 540bhp isnt going to put a 4100lb car any where near the 9s. these writers who "believe him", probably havent ever been to a track, or turned a wrench on a drag car to know what is actually needed to run in the 9s. curt george's challenger ran low 9s, and he had something like 1100hp...
__________________


Here is my question. Why does the carberated version put out more hp than the fuel injected version? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the fuel injection system is a EFI, instead of a SFI system as the 6.1L version has. Wouldn't the hp and tq be better if they used a SFI or a Multiport system.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
ORIGINAL: 1 Bad Mirada
something isnt right in the numbers here..
curt george's challenger ran low 9s, and he had something like 1100hp...
something isnt right in the numbers here..
curt george's challenger ran low 9s, and he had something like 1100hp...
thanks for adding some proper perspective.
ORIGINAL: RLSH700
Here is my question. Why does the carberated version put out more hp than the fuel injected version? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the fuel injection system is a EFI, instead of a SFI system as the 6.1L version has. Wouldn't the hp and tq be better if they used a SFI or a Multiport system.
Here is my question. Why does the carberated version put out more hp than the fuel injected version? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the fuel injection system is a EFI, instead of a SFI system as the 6.1L version has. Wouldn't the hp and tq be better if they used a SFI or a Multiport system.
i do know this, though. i have spent alot of time at the drag strip, and aside from new cars, i see VERY few cars with fuel injection. i have always assumed that it is because the FI systems require alot more work with the need for sensors and a control computer, but evidently the carbs have some sort of performance advantage, but they are far more tempetmental. i would think that with throttle body injection (which is little more than a computerized carb) wouldnt differ that much with the exception of the eletronics. i know someone who has a 9 second chevelle SS, and when he went to the "cool new fuel injection system" the nightmares began...lots of tuning issues, etc.
__________________


I no expert in this department since I have never taken an engine apart so I'm going off of what I've read and heard. A friend of mine who restores cars has always told me that modifying an engine with carbs is much easier than computerised fuel injection. With carbs, you just have to know simple machanics, whereas fuel injection you have to have the right equipment as well as knowledge on how to modify it.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
exactly.
if the mirada runs 'not quite right', i can fix it with very simple tools and some knowledge passed down from my dad...however, if the stratus runs not quite right, i get a CEL, and i have to find a scan tool...then read the code, the try to figure out which component is bad. sometimes it easy, sometimes its very vague.
if the mirada runs 'not quite right', i can fix it with very simple tools and some knowledge passed down from my dad...however, if the stratus runs not quite right, i get a CEL, and i have to find a scan tool...then read the code, the try to figure out which component is bad. sometimes it easy, sometimes its very vague.
__________________


From what I have been told many newer cars are harder to figure out what is wrong because the problem can be so many different things. You can spend a fortune just trying to get an engine to run correctly and still never get it fixed until one day the battery gets disconnected long enough that it somehow fixes the problem which was nothing other than a small glitch in the first place.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
That happens because the memory get wiped clean. Now if the problem was a real problem, it will show up again. If it was just a glitch, it will probably never show up again.
__________________
For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Then you will call upon me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.
For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Then you will call upon me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.


