Notices
General Dodge Challenger Discussions Discuss anything related to the new Dodge Challenger within...
View Poll Results: A poll
Yes this would make sense
33.33%
No this would canibalize sales from the 8
11.11%
This would only make sense if it were $2K more than the SE
16.67%
They couldn't make enough profit and it would cause too much confusion
11.11%
They are going to have enough sales with their current offerings
11.11%
I am offended by the stupidity of this question
16.67%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Challenger 4.0L V6 Hemi

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-14-2008 | 10:44 AM
  #1  
DSkippy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From:
Default Challenger 4.0L V6 Hemi

Since the 5.7 is producing approximately 380HP and the 3.5 is producing 250HP, would it make sense for Chrysler to offer a 4.0L V6 w/ Hemi heads if they could produce 300HP or more from this combo?
__________________
º¿º
~) 69.5 SuperBee

Old 05-14-2008 | 11:21 AM
  #2  
RLSH700's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Challenger 4.0L V6 Hemi

Well Dskippy, I'm one who would like to see this happen, the problem is it won't produce 300 hp with the output of the 5.7L nor the output of the 6.1L without further modifications. I would say a 4.2L Hemi on the basis that would be about the displacement of a V6 made directly from the 5.7L and the output would be around 275-280hp but the tq would be about 300ft-lbs and it could benefit from the MDS and probably get better fuel economy as well as maybe cost less than the 3.5L since this engine apparently isn't that expensive to build.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006

College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing

The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts

Old 05-14-2008 | 11:41 AM
  #3  
DSkippy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Challenger 4.0L V6 Hemi

Using CID to HP ratio as the basis for the extrapolation?
__________________
º¿º
~) 69.5 SuperBee

Old 05-14-2008 | 11:45 AM
  #4  
Billionaire's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Default RE: Challenger 4.0L V6 Hemi

It depends. If 250HP feels weak and lame in the Challenger, then yes.
But if it feels pretty zippy, then it's not that important to offer 4L.
Old 05-14-2008 | 11:45 AM
  #5  
DSkippy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Challenger 4.0L V6 Hemi

Wow, that's interesting..... the 3.5 gets 71 hp per liter where the 5.7 gets 66 hp per liter and the 6.1 get 70 per liter.

Puzzling.....the non Hemi (in this very simplified equation) is more potent than the Hemi? Umhh.????

What am I missing?
__________________
º¿º
~) 69.5 SuperBee

Old 05-14-2008 | 12:28 PM
  #6  
Justinec101's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Challenger 4.0L V6 Hemi

If they could get a challenger out there with around 300hp for 26-27k I'd be all over it.
Old 05-14-2008 | 12:56 PM
  #7  
Thor77's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Challenger 4.0L V6 Hemi

Not sure how to vote, (although the last option is tempting just on humor factor). Relative price of the R/T vs SE will make a big difference. They could probably do an "SXT" or something with a more powerful 6 if there was enough price gap to make it worthwhile. Too close price to the R/T and you'll never sell, to close to the SE and the SE becomes a moot point. I'd say if you can go 3K over the SE, and not get too close to the R/T, it makes sense. I'm not sure they'd call it a hemi though, that might kinda seem odd. And with multivalve engine design, the true "hemi" head isn't even the ideal setup anymore.
Old 05-14-2008 | 01:22 PM
  #8  
RLSH700's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Challenger 4.0L V6 Hemi


ORIGINAL: DSkippy

Wow, that's interesting..... the 3.5 gets 71 hp per liter where the 5.7 gets 66 hp per liter and the 6.1 get 70 per liter.

Puzzling.....the non Hemi (in this very simplified equation) is more potent than the Hemi? Umhh.????

What am I missing?
The 3.5L is a 4 valve per cylinder SOHC engine; whereas, the Hemis are traditional pushrod/OHV 2 valve per cylinder engines. The thing the 3.5L would lack is the torque that you could get from the Hemi which is more important in a heavier car. Also the 3.5L's design is not going to be as consistent in the hp & tq throughout the band as a Hemi would; however, after saying this I will tell you from my own experience the 3.5L feels strong no matter where you hit it.

The reason why I suggested a 4.2L is that Chrysler already has a 4.0L V6 engine and the fact that just as the Chrysler 3.9L V6 the replacement for the slant six and used in the trucks until 2003 was a 318 (5.2L) with two less cylinders. My theory is they should leave the displacement alone if they were to make a V6 from the Hemi (which unfortunately is unlikely to happen). The issue is as well that if you only used a 4.0L V6 Hemi the hp gain would only be about 10hp & the torque would be a 30lbs gain, but people pay far more attention to hp than tq so having 275-280hp & 300ft-lbs of tq would stand out more as an improvement over the 3.5L.

What Chrysler should consider doing is working on offering GDI technology on their engines as they are going to have to do this sooner or later. Since they are planning on retiring the 3.5L in around 201X I doubt they want to spend the money on it. If they added GDI to a V6 Hemi, 300hp would not be out of the imagination and GDI would help with the emission rules and fuel economy, but since they will probably not do this, what they could do is offer a version of the current 4.0L that produces about 285hp & 295ft-lbs of tq in the SEMA Sebring and Avenger.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006

College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing

The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts

Old 05-14-2008 | 06:02 PM
  #9  
Yankee's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Challenger 4.0L V6 Hemi

Well anything IS possible and it is an intriguing idea, but I don't see anything like that ever happening. If gas hits $5-6 a gallon and stays that way (which could happen) and the V8 sales take a major dump as a result... MAYBE I could see Dodge investing in that kind of money and technology for a V6. But the Hemi V8 is clearly the star of the show in the Challenger and, barring a bizarre unforseen economic circumstance, is very likely to stay that way.
Old 05-14-2008 | 08:51 PM
  #10  
Jeremiah 29:11's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,503
Likes: 0
Default RE: Challenger 4.0L V6 Hemi

My Dodge minvan runs pretty fast with a 3.8L engine. I almost beat a Mustang the other day at the red light but he had to fight for it.
__________________
For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Then you will call upon me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.


Quick Reply: Challenger 4.0L V6 Hemi



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:27 AM.