Notices
General Dodge Challenger Discussions Discuss anything related to the new Dodge Challenger within...

Challenger Dimensions vs. competition

Old Mar 14, 2008 | 02:35 PM
  #1  
RLSH700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
From:
Default Challenger Dimensions vs. competition

Since people want to know about the dimensions of the Challenger and how it matches up, I thought I would do everyone a favor and post not just how it compares to the Mustang but any car anyone might want to compare it against.

2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8
Length:…………………………………197.7 in.
Width:……………………………………75.7 in.
Height:………………………………………57 in.
Weight:……………………………………4140 lbs.
Wheel Base:……………………………116 in.
Ground Clearance:…………………5.5 in.
Front Headroom:……………………39.5 in.
Read Headroom:……………………37.4 in.
Front Shoulder Room:……………58.2 in.
Rear Shoulder Room:………………53.9 in.
Front Hip Room:………………………54.7 in.
Rear Hip Room:………………………51.4 in.
Front Leg Room:………………………42 in.
Rear Leg Room:………………………32.6 in.
Maximum Luggage Capacity:…16.2 cu. Ft.
Maximum Seating……………………5

2008 Ford Shelby Mustang GT500
Length:……………………………………187.6 in.
Width:……………………………………74 in.
Height:……………………………………54.5 in.
Weight:…………………………………3920 lbs.
Wheel Base:……………………………107.1 in.
Ground Clearance:…………………5.7 in.
Front Headroom:……………………38.6 in.
Read Headroom:………………………35 in.
Front Shoulder Room:………………55.4 in.
Rear Shoulder Room:………………53.3 in.
Front Hip Room:………………………53.6 in.
Rear Hip Room:………………………46.7 in.
Front Leg Room:………………………42.7 in.
Rear Leg Room:………………………31 in.
Maximum Luggage Capacity:…12.3 cu. Ft.
Maximum Seating……………………4

2008 Mazda RX-8
Length:…………………………………174.3 in.
Width:……………………………………69.7 in.
Height:……………………………………52.8 in.
Weight:…………………………………3053 lbs.
Wheel Base:……………………………106.4 in.
Ground Clearance:…………………4.7 in.
Front Headroom:……………………36.7 in.
Read Headroom:.……………………36.5 in.
Front Shoulder Room:……………54.8 in.
Rear Shoulder Room:………………54.9 in.
Front Hip Room:……………………53.3 in.
Rear Hip Room:………………………48.1 in.
Front Leg Room:………………………42.7 in.
Rear Leg Room:………………………32.2 in.
Maximum Luggage Capacity:…7.6 cu. Ft.
Maximum Seating…………………4

2006 Pontiac GTO
Length:……………………………………189.8 in.
Width:………………………………………72.5 in.
Height:………………………………………54.9 in.
Weight:……………………………………3725 lbs.
Wheel Base:………………………………109.8 in.
Front Headroom:………………………37.3 in.
Read Headroom:.………………………37.3 in.
Front Shoulder Room:………………59.7 in.
Rear Shoulder Room:…………………51.7 in.
Front Hip Room:………………………58 in.
Rear Hip Room:………………………50.2 in.
Front Leg Room:………………………42.2 in.
Rear Leg Room:…………………………37.1 in.
Maximum Luggage Capacity:…7 cu. Ft.
Maximum Seating…………………4

__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006

College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing

The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts

Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 02:42 PM
  #2  
Jeremiah 29:11's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,503
Likes: 0
Default RE: Challenger Dimensions vs. competition

Has the Camaro dimensions not be finalized yet?
__________________
For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Then you will call upon me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 03:05 PM
  #3  
RLSH700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Challenger Dimensions vs. competition

The information has not been listed yet on the normal sources; therefore, it is possible it hasn't been finalized. I haven't been able to find much other than the length is 186.2 in., the width is 79.6 in., and the height is 53 in.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006

College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing

The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts

Reply
Old Apr 11, 2009 | 08:11 AM
  #4  
lear4406's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 1
From: China Grove NC.
Default

OK I can't resist " that Camaro is a fat pig". LOL
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 05:09 PM
  #5  
peppy's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From:
Smile Numbers,Numbers

Over the years I have to admit I have stacked on a few extra pounds but 4100 and then some; why? Is it the frame or just a combination of all that neat stuff that makes it so darn fun to drive.

Joe
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #6  
lear4406's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 1
From: China Grove NC.
Default

Mostly the safety and power accessaries. We have grown used to having our conviencies and they add weight. The cars of today have almost 1/2 more weight added than the cars of the 60s and 70s.The sound systems and extra tube routing for AC in those places we want to be comfortable at. Computorized everything and them talking to one another. So when you add all this up it comes out to be quite porkly. But the HP has increased to the 60s and 70s standard with a whole lot better gas mileage. The ride is better and our comfort is improved quite nicely.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 07:17 PM
  #7  
peppy's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From:
Default

Couldn't agree more about all those creature comforts = nice ride.
The lighter,wilder side of me is hopeful that my local dealership is correct, as they told me that the drag pack will be back in production soon, have you heard anything about that?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
firebird1999us
General Dodge Challenger Discussions
6
Jan 7, 2011 01:57 PM
merc-amg
General Dodge Challenger Discussions
0
Jul 22, 2010 01:21 AM
MrKrisSullivan
General Dodge Challenger Discussions
9
Oct 15, 2008 07:11 PM
cncpt2prod!
General Dodge Challenger Discussions
9
Jan 14, 2008 04:34 AM



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:35 AM.