Chrysler Historical?
In my post in the classic Challenger section, I mentioned my concern about the hood on my Challenger potentially coming to meet me in an accident. I sent a request for information to Chrysler historical:
Hi, Could you give me any information on where to find data, reports, and/or film footage of Chrysler's crash testing of the 1970 Dodge Challenger? Thanks, Russ Boyd Information of that type is not supplied to the public even if it still existed. Regards, Bruce R. Thomas Corporate Historian Bruce, Thank you for your prompt reply to my inquiry, but I am a bit confused. A recent magazine article I read stated that in some crash testing of the 1970 Challenger the hood was sent through the windshield. I own a 1970 Challenger, a product manufactured by your company, that I now learn may have a serious safety defect, and this information is not supplied to the public? It seems I should have some right to have access to information that could directly effect my personal safety. If it is corporate policy not to release this information, who would I need to contact to get that policy changed? Sincerely, Russell Boyd |
RE: Chrysler Historical?
Well, good luck with that. I doubt that information is even around anywhere as well. [&o]
|
RE: Chrysler Historical?
i dont know when the govt started requiring that sort of thing...but i think that it was more recently than 1970. i dont think that many companies put much effort into crashing their cars before it was required.
|
RE: Chrysler Historical?
The 1970 Challenger hood does exactly what you have found. That is why they changed the design of the hood crumple features for 1971 on. I believe that the repro hoods that are available have this upgrade and are correct for 71 thru 74 Challengers. They will work on 70 Challengers though. I have a friend that works for Chrysler as a Crash Test Engineer and he has told me that they do not have records that far back.
Bob |
RE: Chrysler Historical?
I have a friend that works for Chrysler as a Crash Test Engineer and he has told me that they do not have records that far back. So, next question if anyone knows: For that hood to come that far back, there had to be some catastrophic failure point in both the latch and the hinges. Where did they fail? Is this something a set of Grade 8 bolts at the mounting points would fix or is is more complicated than that? I've considered cutting weak points into my bracing, too. Could someone post pics of the underside of your newer hood so I can see where Chrysler put those creases? Sure would be cheaper and easier than a new hood (and the painting it would require). I've been wondering about the whole convertible safety thing lately... There are other obvious issues other than the hood (like the pics of Jeremiah 29:11's friend's truck a few days ago). A full roll cage seems a bit extreme but not completely out of the question. I'm beginning to understand the mentality that caused my mom to sell her '65 Skylark convertible when my sister was born in 1970. There is a whole lot of my dad, and a whole lot of memories in this car; I'd hate to part with it, but I can't see putting myself and my family at unnecessary risk for an occasional wind-in-the-hair ride, either... Maybe I don't need a toy that bad... Just thinking out loud. Decisions, decesions... The kids said keep the K. |
RE: Chrysler Historical?
We had a Christmas party at his house last night and he has already bought another F150 Supercrew to replace the flipped truck.
Trucks are certainly easier to flip over because they are top heavy but cars will to. I could tell he was ready for the party to be over because his body was still in pain all over from when the truck flipped. I do not think the human body is meant to take that kind of abuse. |
RE: Chrysler Historical?
Between the safety issues and the price of Sunoco Ultra, my wife and I are leaning toward an extended sabbatical for the Challenger. Full tank w/ Sta-Bil, oil change, jack stands; time to pray, think, and prioritize, but nothing rash or irreversible.
|
RE: Chrysler Historical?
ORIGINAL: Jeremiah 29:11 We had a Christmas party at his house last night and he has already bought another F150 Supercrew to replace the flipped truck. Trucks are certainly easier to flip over because they are top heavy but cars will to. I could tell he was ready for the party to be over because his body was still in pain all over from when the truck flipped. I do not think the human body is meant to take that kind of abuse. |
RE: Chrysler Historical?
SUV's flip over the worse because they are top heavy and the width from wheel to wheel is narrow than a truck typically.
You can flip it over by turning it too fast. Truck's are also top heavy and as such if you hit it with a low car it will flip it over and that is exactly what happend to my friend. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:45 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands