That car is not from 1964. That is a 69' Barracuda.

 

From the lack of side marker lights, I'd say it was a '67.

 

I don't think that number is a year. It's definitely NOT a '64 Barracuda, which was one of the ugliest cars ever built with it fishbowl rear window.



[IMG]local://upfiles/148/40F2BD26CEE242259DAFB98265E92375.jpg[/IMG]

 

I know it isn't a 1964 Barrcuda, that car stands out in a crowd and not in a good way, the thing that confuses me though is if it is a 1967 Cuda, then why does it have 1964 listed on the windows? Is it some kind of special meeting or is it by coincidence that it got a racing number that one would think was a year.

 

I think it's just a coincidence. Sometimes, we all try to read too much into stuff.

 

Hey, lay off the 64-66 Barracuda. They may not have been the beautiful E-Body’s, but every car had a humble beginning.

I still don't think that is a 67, in 67 it was still more of a fastback look, the back window went back a lot farther. in 69 they moved away from the fast back look and the deck lid increased in size.

I'd almost guarantee that is a 69. I'm at work so I can't look it up though.

RLSH, I'd say it's just dumb luck that the racing number is 1964

 

You're probably right about that.

66Cuda, I apologize. I didn't mean to offend you.

 

Lack of side markers would indicate '67. Plymouth Barracudas shared body style in years 1967 through 1969. This example is just the notchback version... not the fastback. Fastback and notchback versions were available all three model years. Major body change to e-body in 1970 marked the begining of the short deck.

 

great pick i remember seeing the 70 charger from the fast and the furious pull a wheelie

 

I'll have to look into this, I can't ever remember seeing a 67 notchback and I have seen a lot of A-body Cuda's having owned one. Not saying your wrong, I'm just not sure.

RLSH, no offence taken.