View Single Post
Old 06-23-2007, 09:44 AM
  #18  
RLSH700
Super Moderator
 
RLSH700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Car Companies

And they will implode just like the Big Three because their arrogance is getting the best of them already. They focused on perceived quality by calling certain things maintenance and having the customer replace them at the customers expense. They are not the benchmarkers in safety. They have had their safety issues as well espically on some of their RAV4 models in the past with flipping over too easily.

There is no way on earth that anyone in their right mind could claim that Chrysler's interior could possibly be lower than GMs. GM interior is very akwardly set up, is super cheap, and down right ugly. The only GM division that has any decent leather until Lutz took over was Cadillac. Chrysler's leather is much nicer than anything from any of the other GM divisions. GM's steering wheels lose their coloration and foam consistently. Until Lutz was incharge many of Pontiacs seats were practically the same as they offered back in the 80s. The "leather" that they offered in the Grand Prix until Lutz came in was more similar to plastic than leather. The LeSabre's leather was also supe cheap. GM has the reputation for the most generic interior. I simply don't buy that at all. Some Ford models might have better interior but not all models. Heck my friends who own Japanese cars even say that Chrysler interior is actually nice and complain about GMs on a regular basis.

Okay here's your opportunity, what is so terrible about Chrysler's interior?
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006

College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing

The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts