RLSH700

Okay, now I suggest you see things from my perspective. If you were in fact playing devil's advocate, you could have been a little more obvious about it. The reason why I jumped on you for that is I am aware of the way particular people respond to threads like this. If you so much as hint that there is the slightest possibility that the Challenger will not be produced, they go absolutely nuts. The world is coming to an end and there is nothing you can do to calm them down for at least a month. Most commonly people who post ideas such as your's are doing nothing else than trying to get attention.

The problem with your hinting that the Challenger might not be produced due to this new guy being the executive of Chrysler is that it is simply illogical. A lugitimate representative from Chrysler had just confirmed it on our forum (once again and gave us some futher details). Then you say that it might not be produced when you have absolutely no source or basis to your argument; therefore, you are using a scare tactic to turn people against the new guy because you seem to have a disliking of the new executive. This is completely unnecessary.

If I really wanted to I could either lock this thread after this post or delete the whole thread; however, this has not violated the rules in a way that would warrant such a decision at this point. My reason for moving this to the "Off Topic" section is that it simply has almost nothing to do with the new Challenger. This is really about Chrysler's new executive and the structure of Chrysler; therefore, it is off topic. You may not understand this yet because you are still new to the site and learning what is Off Topic and what falls into General 2008 Challenger Discussions. This is why the older members were happy with me moving it to the Off Topic section, not because they are all against you and your topic but because that is part of the rules. Having this moved to the Off Topic section is not to be taken as an insult, in fact the Off Topic section is one of our most popular sections on the site. If I wanted to move it to somewhere dead, I would have posted it in the Buy and Sell section. Also I provided the link under the General 2008 Challenger Discussion so then the people who agree with your perspective could still find it after I moved it. If I wanted to hush up this section in that way, I would not have provided the link.

I am perfectly happy to hear that your enjoying this site, that is what I like to hear; however, the reason why we have moderators is to keep discussions under control and civil. You may think that I'm being a bully by responding to your thread the way I have; however, I encourage you to look at internet sites that have no moderators (or at least bad ones) like say Youtube and see how uncivil they are. On those sites, people make death threats, rape threats, and other things that should not be accepted over small disagreements and there is no one keeping things under control. On those sites, you have true bullies that cannot be stopped and that ruins a forum for those who want to have a civil conversation. The issue is we have had trouble with newer members from time to time, starting subjects that were counterversial that caused a lot of disruption and fights. This is also why I responded the way I did.

Also your respond to my first post in this thread is nothing other than an attempt to use a martyr mentallity saying that you represent "Freedom of Speech" while you allege that I'm trying to shut you up; meanwhile, you try to shut up cncpt2prod! who happens to disagree with you by "poisoning the well" via accusing him of being bribed to say nice things about this new executive. Also some food for thought, since you believe that Nardeli was passed up for the top position of GE for a good reason, then explain this. Was Bob Lutz passed over for the top position at Chrysler for some good reason or because the people at th