RLSH700

I'm getting very sick of the smart remarks of these nobodies. Note to Edmunds, your test IS invalid. You have not tested the Camaro yet nor the Challenger to the degree that you need to. You cannot pull out a crystal ball and instantly declare the Challenger the loser in a comparison when you have nothing to compare to it when you haven't even tested it yet. You're comparison is about as valid as determining what will be a better independent mom and pop restaurant between Mexican and Italian based on your experiences from the Taco Bell and Pizza Hut you already have. Don't write until you actually have the cars in front of you, otherwise it is like determining who will be the better wife based on pictures you have seen on the internet and knowing their cousins.

Another thing, stop ripping off bad jokes and titles of books from failed talk radio hosts for your points. If you can't come up with anything original, then get a different job. If you can't write objectively, and making it extremely obvious that you are trying to tare down a car that is just being released, then don't.

The Challenger is not in full production yet and you can't start bashing the Challenger for being a limited model and play war games with something you don't even know if they are going to use in the Camaro. If the engine is completely what makes this car a king, then explain to me why the Firebird/Camaro FAILED when they were arguably faster and cheaper than the Mustang when they were dropped. Completely invalid and illogical on so many levels. Also, I refuse to buy your numbers after REAL publications that have been around longer than you and have something called a reputation are getting faster numbers for the LX cars than you have. You have a credibility problem and your stale jokes aren't helping either. GET A LIFE LOSERS AT EDMUNDS!

kevin, in the future, if you develop more points after posting the first point, please edit and add those points to the first one. We want to cut back on double posting as much as possible.