my point is that there shouldnt be a comparison to an engine that is a year old, and "only" produces 425hp...when the mustang is using an engine that has been used for quite a while, and has 500 hp.

plus, the challenger is a new car..there are bound to be "bugs", where as the stang is not...

so..

40 grand for a car with a more powerful, proven engine and proven chassis, compared to a car that is made out of a sedan chassis, with an engine that hasnt really been pushed much, with 75 less hp...for the same price??