View Single Post
Old 06-23-2006, 06:54 PM
  #6  
RLSH700
Super Moderator
 
RLSH700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Challenger T/A history

Patrick were you talking to me or Jeremiah, I'm guessing Jeremiah. The 340 was underrated big time and was amazing, I just prefer if money is no object to have the HEMI. If money was an object then the 340. The T/A was one tuff package and demanded major respect. How did the T/A package compare against their competition from GM and Ford, (did they kick the other two's behinds).
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006

College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing

The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts