Old Dec 13, 2006 | 04:44 PM
  #1  
joeyr's Avatar
joeyr
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From:
Default Motor Trend article suggests no V6 for challenger

This article was in the lastest motor trend. Even though I want a 5.7 or 6.1 with a 6-speed, I still would like for a 6 cyclinder to be produced. By the way that green mustang is the bullit mustang

Why Mustang is making life tough for Chevy and Dodge

The Mustang is cheap to build. And that's causing major headaches for planners at Chevrolet and Dodge as they work on their own, more sophisticated, musclecars.

[IMG]local://upfiles/374/7D275DE8CFD940C69F33EDF0A975A8F7.jpg[/IMG]

Whispers out of Auburn Hills hint DaimlerChrysler couldn't figure out how to price a V-6 Challenger within $5000 of a base Mustang and now won't even bother offering an entry-level model. The problem is the Challenger's platform which will underpin the next-gen Chrysler 300 and Dodge Charger, features a more expensive independent rear-suspension setup. Dodge marketers figure the Challenger will appeal most to baby boomers who have the money to splash on a well-specified V-8, anyway. But this also limits the car's potential sale and makes the already wafer-thin profit margins even thinner.[/b]
[IMG]local://upfiles/374/0DEED1EDF7024612BE48105E8602AD33.jpg[/IMG]

Chevy faces a similar cost problem with the independent rearend Zeta platform of the new Camaro. The Zeta architecture will be more widely used, helping costs, but insiders admit GM will struggle to get a base V-6 Camaro near $20,000, mainly because the logical engine for the car-the DOHC, 3.6-liter high-feature V-6-ain't cheap, nor is the new six-speed automatic it needs.

[IMG]local://upfiles/374/CD374DF4B03340D8B73A2660795CB6CF.jpg[/IMG]

Reply