Convertible?
#11
RE: Convertible?
The only reason why I think that they would not make a cuda model instead of a kit of some kind is that it may cannibalize challenger sales. But, if the challenger base model (goes with the cheap price of plymouth) or "dayonta level" was made into a cuda complete with plymouth badges and slightly different body panels, they could kill two birds with one stone.
#12
RE: Convertible?
ORIGINAL: joeyr
The only reason why I think that they would not make a cuda model instead of a kit of some kind is that it may cannibalize challenger sales. But, if the challenger base model (goes with the cheap price of plymouth) or "dayonta level" was made into a cuda complete with plymouth badges and slightly different body panels, they could kill two birds with one stone.
The only reason why I think that they would not make a cuda model instead of a kit of some kind is that it may cannibalize challenger sales. But, if the challenger base model (goes with the cheap price of plymouth) or "dayonta level" was made into a cuda complete with plymouth badges and slightly different body panels, they could kill two birds with one stone.
#13
RE: Convertible?
ORIGINAL: RLSH700
The Challenger warrants a convertible, not offering one would be a big mistake. If the PT Cruiser has one, then the Challenger should have one.
I'd say if the Chrysler division would end their stupid strategy of cheapness and rid itself of the Plymouth line-up (PT Cruiser, non C models of the 300, base and Touring levels of the Sebring, non-luxury levels of the Town & Country, etc.) and return those to their rightful owner to revive Plymouth, a Cuda would be the perfect addition as long as it competes as a Plymouth is supposed to (ultimate discount performance no flashy stuff like leather and such).
Plymouth would be successful again because its legendary muscle car would be back to identify the brand with, but since I know that reviving Plymouth is about as likely as me running DCX, I hope Chrysler will consider adding the Cuda to its line-up, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
The Challenger warrants a convertible, not offering one would be a big mistake. If the PT Cruiser has one, then the Challenger should have one.
I'd say if the Chrysler division would end their stupid strategy of cheapness and rid itself of the Plymouth line-up (PT Cruiser, non C models of the 300, base and Touring levels of the Sebring, non-luxury levels of the Town & Country, etc.) and return those to their rightful owner to revive Plymouth, a Cuda would be the perfect addition as long as it competes as a Plymouth is supposed to (ultimate discount performance no flashy stuff like leather and such).
Plymouth would be successful again because its legendary muscle car would be back to identify the brand with, but since I know that reviving Plymouth is about as likely as me running DCX, I hope Chrysler will consider adding the Cuda to its line-up, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
#14
RE: Convertible?
ORIGINAL: ED1971PA
RLSH, U have my vote for CEO of DCX and my undieing loyalty. lol
RLSH, U have my vote for CEO of DCX and my undieing loyalty. lol
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
#16
RE: Convertible?
ORIGINAL: joeyr
Ditto!, just please no more dr Z. commericals.
Ditto!, just please no more dr Z. commericals.
That would be the only case where you would see Dr. Z if I was in charge, no more of this "Ze best of American und German engineering" crap. On the other hand, I might use that slogan for Mercedes for the SUV models based off of the Grand Cherokee. I probably wouldn't, but it would be funny to propose that to the arrogant executives of Mercedes. The looks that would be on there face would be priceless.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts