Notices
Dodge Challenger R/T Threads specific to the Dodge Challenger R/T should be placed here.

R/T vs GT vs GTO

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 12:23 PM
  #81  
RUBBERBNDMAN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: R/T vs GT vs GTO

LOL...they were chirps....the squeal came at take off....
You got me thinking though....
I need louder exhaust......
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 01:28 PM
  #82  
Andre@Edge's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 0
Default RE: R/T vs GT vs GTO

RUBBERBNDMAN,

Bro, What have I told you about picking on the young little girls on the forum!
If you are not careful ******* will run to mommy and we will get shut down.

The squeal you heard from the mustang was most likely the driver, as many think the Mustang a "chick" car.

Question? Since when did little girls have gaint *****?

No worries ... Drive it, or deny it....

For the record, I like all the pony cars.... But I like the horse I have in the garage more.

Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #83  
vynle's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: R/T vs GT vs GTO

whats funny here is i belong to a mustang forum as well as this one , and i did a seach on our challengers to see the smack they run about our srt8's and i can honestly say they dont even talk about them. seems to me the handful of members here are the only ones concerned about mustangs vrs challengers. get over urselves boys, if it wernt for the mustangs going back to the retro look in 05, you wouldnt even have ur challengers!!!!!! and as ive stated before stock gts almost are as fast as the srt8s and who cares about topend, going 172mph where u gonna do that? but put them in a quarter mi. lets see the times, bring us timeslips and post. thats the onlything mustang owners care about " walk the walk" . my buddies GT is running 17lbs of turbo boost and layin down 589rwhp and over 600fptq. and will pin u to the seat where u cant even move.this car runs with vipers and vetts and they dont even want a piece of it. he looks totaly stock and would love to put u in ur place. stop bashing and be happy with what u got!!!!! vynle
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 02:55 PM
  #84  
Riptide's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: R/T vs GT vs GTO

ORIGINAL: Andre@Edge
If you are not careful ******* will run to mommy and we will get shut down.
I won't tell if you won't.
as many think the Mustang a "chick" car.
"many" in this case ofcourse means *****bags like you.
Question? Since when did little girls have gaint *****?
I don't know. Perhaps we should ask your mother?
But I like the horse I have in the garage more.
It's more of a shetland really.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 03:19 PM
  #85  
lear4406's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 1
From: China Grove NC.
Default RE: R/T vs GT vs GTO

Can we get back to cars. You guys kill me. I can honestly say this is a guy forum... the testostoron is running deep I know I spelled that wrong.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 03:24 PM
  #86  
vynle's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: R/T vs GT vs GTO

testosterone! lol. vynle
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 03:54 PM
  #87  
JLockhart's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default RE: R/T vs GT vs GTO


ORIGINAL: vynle

if it wernt for the mustangs going back to the retro look in 05, you wouldnt even have ur challengers!!!!!!
What are you basing that statement on. Is it also true that there wouldn't be an 05 Mustang without a new beetle?


my buddies GT is running 17lbs of turbo boost and layin down 589rwhp and over 600fptq. and will pin u to the seat where u cant even move.this car runs with vipers and vetts and they dont even want a piece of it. he looks totaly stock and would love to put u in ur place. stop bashing and be happy with what u got!!!!! vynle
I'm sure everyone knows someone with a fast car, so what? Yes, if you turbo a V8 and get it set up right, it will go fast. A turboed Challenger will make great numbers as well.

That being said, I don't think that in general R/Ts are going to be going around spanking GTs. Out there on the streets, the GTs have been around a few more years, and therefore more of them are modded, and many times that will make up for the edge the Challenger may have when both are stock.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 04:23 PM
  #88  
lear4406's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 1
From: China Grove NC.
Default RE: R/T vs GT vs GTO

I know a lot of folks will look at this as bantering and bickering, but its just like I remember on the streets. We called it junk talking in its edited version. As long as it doesn't get to be a personal bash... I like it. It takes me back to the 70s and how we used to talk up a good race. Poor mouthing and trash talking, then the deal. You gotta love it... its the 70s all over again. But my monies on the Challenger and no other stats needed to prove my point. I like the Challenger and everyones entitled to pick their brand and be loyal. So keep the statistics coming and the trash talking going because its the way it was done back in the bad old days
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 04:37 PM
  #89  
vynle's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: R/T vs GT vs GTO

the beetle wasnt a muscle car! so u cant even put it in the same league. u should have said, maybe the t-bird! w/e . my statement holds true and i dont have to base it on anything! if the 05 and up mustangs had failed, chrysler would never even have made the challenger . ur deluted. your second statement ur right," so what?" remember i have one thing u dont !!!! i have both!!! see the sig? i dont bash my cars . i love them for what they are. u need to read the whole thread to get a better understanding for what i said in my post. stock for stock the r/t and gt are in the same league and perhaps even the srt8 is with them as well. the gt500 stock for stock would eat up this srt8. these challengers are heavy, 4 to 500 pounds heavier than the gts. u need alot of hp to compensate for this weight. this car even with a twinscrew, roots, centri, or turbo can only safely run with 6 lbs of boost on the stock internals because of the 10.4 to 1 compression. the gt500 can easily surpass 700rwhp with its stock internals. this car cant compete without major rebuilding.
my gt with a safe tune can run 12lbs of boost, a ticking time bomb( maybe) , but it will put over 500hp to the wheels. and with 4 lbs at 400rwhp it is faster than the srt8. nuff said! lol vynle
ORIGINAL: JLockhart


ORIGINAL: vynle

if it wernt for the mustangs going back to the retro look in 05, you wouldnt even have ur challengers!!!!!!
What are you basing that statement on. Is it also true that there wouldn't be an 05 Mustang without a new beetle?


my buddies GT is running 17lbs of turbo boost and layin down 589rwhp and over 600fptq. and will pin u to the seat where u cant even move.this car runs with vipers and vetts and they dont even want a piece of it. he looks totaly stock and would love to put u in ur place. stop bashing and be happy with what u got!!!!! vynle
I'm sure everyone knows someone with a fast car, so what? Yes, if you turbo a V8 and get it set up right, it will go fast. A turboed Challenger will make great numbers as well.

That being said, I don't think that in general R/Ts are going to be going around spanking GTs. Out there on the streets, the GTs have been around a few more years, and therefore more of them are modded, and many times that will make up for the edge the Challenger may have when both are stock.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 04:41 PM
  #90  
kevin2323's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: R/T vs GT vs GTO

good points both andre and riptide should squash the beef and not get personal. Begining with andre who instigated the personal attacks.

so do us all a favor put your ego in a box put it away because you guys are starting to sound like muscleheads with no brains. Except in reality there are no muscles (jk
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 PM.