Notices
General Dodge Challenger Discussions Discuss anything related to the new Dodge Challenger within...

2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8; Revealed Officially

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-06-2008 | 06:15 AM
  #21  
MGDMike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8; Revealed Officially


ORIGINAL: Yankee

The older Challenger in the pic is either a 73 or 74.

Well............

Here we are, the day we've all been waiting for has finally come. Even though we still won't see any on the road for another few months yet, "the" Challenger is here.

My thoughts are thus:

I still think the "Challenger" nameplate is on the wrong side of the grille.

I'm not a fan of what should have been the high-beam headlights as the parking lights.

The body sides look flatter on the production than the concept, which I think looked more rounded (a look I would have preferred). That might be an optical illusion, I'll grant you, so I'll reserve final judgement on that one.

I still think Chrysler did the car a disservice by giving it a modified Charger dashboard instead of the concept's, which was a thing of beauty and one of the car's strongest points.

BUT...

In the immortal words of Mick Jagger... you can't always get what you want.

So, with that said, I'm still glad it's here and I still want one. BAD. Make mine dark red with a 6-speed please.

I remember the first thing my minister used to say before every sermon at the start of the church service, and I think it's befitting today...

"This is the day that The Lord has made. Let us rejoice... and be glad in it."
Amen brother Yankee!!
Old 02-06-2008 | 06:28 AM
  #22  
Riptide's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8; Revealed Officially

I hate to rain on the parade here but this car is seriously heavy. 4100 pounds? Jesus.

http://jalopnik.com/352792/2008-dodg...led-officially
The performance "targets" were a 0-60 mph time in the low fives, a quarter-mile in less than 14 seconds, at least 0.88 g's on the skidpad and a 60-0 mph stopping time of about 110 feet.
At $41K and it's going to barely beat the $28K Mustang GT? C'mon...

I love the styling and I think it looks way better than the GT as well but that's insane. I'm disappointed.
Old 02-06-2008 | 06:39 AM
  #23  
Michaelgggg's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default RE: 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8; Revealed Officially

I agree with Riptide. Still a nice looking car and good perf numbers but my mustang gt conv is just as quick/or farely close on 89 octane plus 17-18 mpg city and 22+mpg highway.
I probably will still get one but no way am I paying over msrp.
Old 02-06-2008 | 06:54 AM
  #24  
awsure's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8; Revealed Officially

A crotch rocket is faster & cheaper than both. Why don't you get one of those?
Old 02-06-2008 | 06:56 AM
  #25  
Yankee's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8; Revealed Officially

Now THAT'S one complaint I don't fully understand... it's too heavy? [&:]

I agree it would be better if the car were several hundred pounds lighter, but since the Feds keep requiring new safety equipment year after year, it's only gonna get worse - all that stuff adds weight. Hell even a lowly Honda Civic is pushing 3,000 lbs these days. ALL cars are getting heavier nowadays, it's not just the Challenger. Unfortunately it's just the nature of the beast.
Old 02-06-2008 | 07:10 AM
  #26  
Riptide's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8; Revealed Officially

The bottom line is you can spend $28K on a GT and get the same type of performance.

While I like the Challenger's styling over the GT no way is it worth the extra money when you take the performance into account. It's just not fast enough to warrant that price.

As for the motorcycle comment I'm not looking for a fast motorcycle. I'm looking for a fast car. And the Challenger is, sadly, a bad value in that department.
Old 02-06-2008 | 07:19 AM
  #27  
WhiteHeat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8; Revealed Officially


Edmunds "Inside Line" page is currently unavailable. I've never seen that before. Gee, I wonder if there's any interest in the new Challenger?

Old 02-06-2008 | 07:19 AM
  #28  
cncpt2prod!'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8; Revealed Officially

[sm=Awwww.gif] Pinch me!!! Tell me I'm not dreaming!!!!!!
This car is AMAZING!!!!!!!!!
Everything is spot on!!! This is more than I could have ever hoped to see in my lifetime.
A true...Concept to Production!!!!!!!!!
I can't wait to read about it, se more photos, see it on the dealer showroom, see it on the road, and drive mine off a lot someday, soon... at MSPR of course
[sm=gears.gif] [sm=gears.gif][sm=gears.gif]
Old 02-06-2008 | 07:52 AM
  #29  
kevin2323's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8; Revealed Officially

they are guesstimating the 0-60.... the chargers srt8 was said to go in 5 flat and ppl have clocked it right under 5 or less on the forums.... so dont underestimate this car just yet geez so many haterz the minute they dont see 0-60 in 3 sec. and stop spreading rumors that this cars competition is a stock gt .. it doesnt stand a chance
Old 02-06-2008 | 08:05 AM
  #30  
awsure's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8; Revealed Officially

You know Riptide seems to be on one side and you are on the other. Put down the kool-aid dude. It's not bad but from concept to production there are SIGNIFICANT differences. It's not bad but measured against what the designers showed us it falls short.

It's one of those things where I wish I never saw the concept and ignorance would prove bliss no doubt. Unfortunately, I have glimpsed near perfection & anything else is a mockery.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:35 AM.