Notices
General Dodge Challenger Discussions Discuss anything related to the new Dodge Challenger within...

6.1L vs. 5.7L Manual Trans HP Ratings?

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-01-2008, 12:45 AM
  #1  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
DSkippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 6.1L vs. 5.7L Manual Trans HP Ratings?

OK, here's a question to ponder. Chrysler shows 5 more HP on the 5.7 mated to a manual transmission and provides no discrepancy for the 6.1 mated to a manual tranmission. Does this seem likely that on the 6.1 HP is identical through two different transmissions?
__________________
º¿º
~) 69.5 SuperBee

Old 04-01-2008, 03:11 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
JJMPB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1L vs. 5.7L Manual Trans HP Ratings?

i think i remember reading when the 5.7 numbers came out for the challenger it has something to do with the exhaust on the manual it is setup a little different giving you 5 more hp no sure why though
Old 04-01-2008, 06:49 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Mopar_Nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1L vs. 5.7L Manual Trans HP Ratings?

I read that the manual RT gets a "unique dual exhaust that has two low-restriction bottle resonators replacing the underfloor muffler."

Source: Allpar's Challenger page (in the paragraph below the side shot of the red Challenger, last sentence.)
Old 04-01-2008, 06:57 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
DK challenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1L vs. 5.7L Manual Trans HP Ratings?

I hope the different exhaust sounds like the 1970's, that would be cool. Well it really won't matter because i will probaly swicth them for Flowmasters or Cherry bombs.
Old 04-01-2008, 09:27 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Cuda340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 6.1L vs. 5.7L Manual Trans HP Ratings?

Dodge has stated that the exhaust note on the SRT is at the highest maximum decibel readings permitted under state regulations. [sm=badbadbad.gif]

I assume that the R/T's will be almost as good.
Old 04-01-2008, 10:14 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
npeifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1L vs. 5.7L Manual Trans HP Ratings?


ORIGINAL: Cuda340

Dodge has stated that the exhaust note on the SRT is at the highest maximum decibel readings permitted under state regulations. [sm=badbadbad.gif]

I assume that the R/T's will be almost as good.
It is wrong to assume that the R/T's will be almost the same in every way as the SRT8. That is simply a hope and prayer for those who do NOT buy the big dog SRT8.

If Chrysler did that , why would anyone buy the SRT8 ? They have to make enough of a difference to justify the extra $$$.
Old 04-01-2008, 01:53 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Cuda340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 6.1L vs. 5.7L Manual Trans HP Ratings?

Agreed. That is why I qualified it by saying ALMOST as good.

Also, I was only referring to the exhaust sound. Everyone knows that the SRT is superior to the R/T in horsepower, braking, handling, and trim levels.
Old 04-01-2008, 02:28 PM
  #8  
Super Moderator
 
RLSH700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1L vs. 5.7L Manual Trans HP Ratings?

I could see this go in one of two ways. It is possible that the lower output through the exhaust was intended on the automatic for the R/T so then people would only need to use the more affordable mid-grade fuel over premium needed on the manual models, on the other hand as others have already stated the SRT is already hitting the limit as is with the laws, so then again it might not. I also have read before that the 5-speed W5A580's torque limit is supposed to be around 427 ft-lbs, so it is possible that they might have held back on the engine so then it wouldn't blow anything and since we know that the TR-6060 can handle far more than 427ft-lbs without breaking a sweat, it is possible the output might be higher.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006

College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing

The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts

Old 04-01-2008, 02:32 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
JJMPB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1L vs. 5.7L Manual Trans HP Ratings?

most people are gonna go aftermarket on mufflers anyway so it wont really matter
Old 04-01-2008, 02:40 PM
  #10  
Super Moderator
 
RLSH700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 6.1L vs. 5.7L Manual Trans HP Ratings?


ORIGINAL: JJMPB

most people are gonna go aftermarket on mufflers anyway so it wont really matter
Well, what matters is in the case of the magazine show downs. The extra output might be the deciding difference no matter how small it is. Also, some states have tighter regulations that would limit your options as well.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006

College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing

The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts



Quick Reply: 6.1L vs. 5.7L Manual Trans HP Ratings?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:24 PM.