Notices
General Dodge Challenger Discussions Discuss anything related to the new Dodge Challenger within...

Fully Functional Hood Inlets?

Old Apr 2, 2008 | 06:02 AM
  #11  
DSkippy's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Fully Functional Hood Inlets?

But yeah, I'm not sure that would be all that impressive visually (may get the cold air induction) but I doubt it would shake much as, stated by someone before, engines are so well balanced and mounted, they ain't shaking much these days.
__________________
º¿º
~) 69.5 SuperBee

Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 06:55 AM
  #12  
Overpowered's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Frisco, TX
Default RE: Fully Functional Hood Inlets?

I would be willing to kick some cash in for a really functional factory option like the fresh air induction scoop formally known as shaker.

You can throw in the bigger cam with the scoop as a package so it gets that idle lope that would make it shake with the whole car so "shaker" would not be a lie.


ORIGINAL: DK challenger

I would be willing to pay $1,000 more for a functional shaker hood from the factory. Would any one else?
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 06:57 AM
  #13  
DK challenger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Fully Functional Hood Inlets?

Your right about that DamnSkippy, it won't be much oof a shaker without it shaking.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 07:17 AM
  #14  
Cuda340's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Default RE: Fully Functional Hood Inlets?


ORIGINAL: specwar64

Do i hear "shaker with fully operable butterflies here"? Would be nice if they offered that in time.
I really would have liked the functional butterfly valves. If it was purely a cost issue, they could have saved money by using the manual under-the-dash cable control that they had on the 1970-71 Challengers and 'Cudas. That system worked well. You just had to remember to pull the flap closed when it rained.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 07:23 AM
  #15  
DK challenger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Fully Functional Hood Inlets?

You could be right Overpowerd, with a bigger cam it might shake better, it would sound better too.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 10:55 AM
  #16  
Cuda340's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Default RE: Fully Functional Hood Inlets?


ORIGINAL: DK challenger

I would be willing to pay $1,000 more for a functional shaker hood from the factory. Would any one else?
I would. That is in the ballpark with the price of the original shakers on the 1970-71 Challengers and 'Cudas. Back in those days, the shaker was a $97 option on a $3,500 car (2.8% of the sales price). Remember, you are not only paying for the shaker air scoop and related hardware, but also a different hood.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #17  
66Cuda's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Fully Functional Hood Inlets?


ORIGINAL: Cuda340


ORIGINAL: DK challenger

I would be willing to pay $1,000 more for a functional shaker hood from the factory. Would any one else?
I would. That is in the ballpark with the price of the original shakers on the 1970-71 Challengers and 'Cudas. Back in those days, the shaker was a $97 option on a $3,500 car (2.8% of the sales price). Remember, you are not only paying for the shaker air scoop and related hardware, but also a different hood.
I would love to see this option on a production car. If were to come though, you can bet it'll be expensive and I would bet it would be limited to short run. The new Challengers aren’t set up the way the old ones where. It wont be as simple as putting the shaker and carb together on the manifold. The new challengers throttle body is at the front of the engine. To put a Shaker on you’re looking at a major rework of the air induction system.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #18  
RLSH700's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Fully Functional Hood Inlets?


ORIGINAL: Jeremiah 29:11

Like I said in another thread, functional means a performance enhancement which this does not do.

I think we all initially thought it would certainly have a ram air effect into the throttle body. Oh well, certainly disappointed.

I did not like that Dodge did that. Aftermarket here I come.
With that K&N intake they had on the concept they had us believing that would be. I wish they would have made them functional.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006

College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing

The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts

Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 04:56 PM
  #19  
DK challenger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Fully Functional Hood Inlets?

If they don't offer a shaker I will be forced to get a K&N intake. If they do offer a shaker how much more horsepower will it make?
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 04:59 PM
  #20  
Cuda340's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Default RE: Fully Functional Hood Inlets?

The old shakers were good for 5 hp at the top end.
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:58 PM.