Why do people buy muscle cars automatic?
#21
RE: Why do people buy muscle cars automatic?
ORIGINAL: DamnSkippy
Wonder if Chrysler will begin to explore the land of CVT...when talking about the resonance of the exhaust during hard exceleration.....imagine no rewinding of the gears at all......just an acceleration of the engine until you're at 160.....hmmm....
Of course again....wouldn't phase me as I'm manual transmission headed.....
Wonder if Chrysler will begin to explore the land of CVT...when talking about the resonance of the exhaust during hard exceleration.....imagine no rewinding of the gears at all......just an acceleration of the engine until you're at 160.....hmmm....
Of course again....wouldn't phase me as I'm manual transmission headed.....
What I would like Chrysler to offer for an automatic on the new Challenger is one of those dual-clutch automatics once any bugs have been resolved. Those are more efficient than conventional automatics due to the use of clutches over a torque converter (if I'm understanding this correctly), they shift much quicker, they get better fuel economy, and from what I have read have the potential of being more reliable.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
#22
RE: Why do people buy muscle cars automatic?
I don't know if current CVT technology would even be able to handle the kind of power that the Challenger is projected to have. So far they've been fairly limited in terms of the torque they can transmit because of their design (relying on chain or belt drive).
#23
RE: Why do people buy muscle cars automatic?
ORIGINAL: Thor77
I don't know if current CVT technology would even be able to handle the kind of power that the Challenger is projected to have. So far they've been fairly limited in terms of the torque they can transmit because of their design (relying on chain or belt drive).
I don't know if current CVT technology would even be able to handle the kind of power that the Challenger is projected to have. So far they've been fairly limited in terms of the torque they can transmit because of their design (relying on chain or belt drive).
Beyond any of this, cars that offered CVTs as options have historically not done well. The Ford dropped that option out of the Freestyle and the Five Hundred/Taurus as they were not a well accepted item. GM tried for a few years with the Saturn Vue and Ion and ended up going back to a 4-speed auto. If you look around you'll see that they just haven't been a popular move to make. I say try the dual-clutch route or figure out a way to make a performance minded spec version of the 68RFE. That would have more than enough torque capacity for needs of automatic drivers, not to mention towing for that matter.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sworn
Dodge Challenger R/T
19
01-11-2009 01:46 PM
Jeremiah 29:11
Challenger News
6
09-26-2006 07:55 PM
DARK AGE 53
General Dodge Challenger Discussions
24
03-09-2006 03:27 PM