Avenger....what's with that
#1
Avenger....what's with that
ok so it's been a while since i last posted....i feel like i'm confessing....but here's the thing.....my dream car was my 1969 Dodge Dart GT and ever since i've been looking for a viable replacement.....checked out the charger....gag.....and yesterday i checked out the avenger....double gag....what's with the 300 styling?....they all look the same....i'm going to be 50 next year and i really want to buy myself another dream car.....is the challenger really in the works for 2008? and if so...where is it?
#2
RE: Avenger....what's with that
From what I understand it will be introduced in March-April area of 2008. BTW, welcome to the site!
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
#4
RE: Avenger....what's with that
Overall, I like the Avenger except for them using the EGJ version of the 3.5L instead of the EGG H.O. version of the 3.5L and their choice to deny the new 6-speed automatic the Variable Line Pressure system to improve performance, fuel economy, and reliability. They should make this new 6-speed standard on all trim levels to give it a competitive advantage in fuel mileage and potentially performance, and replace the 2.7L with the more reliable 3.3L OHV.
I like the exterior styling; however, I can see your point as well. It appeals only to a particular audience which is more likely to be interested in the Charger. If they intend to compete with only two car divisions, they need to diversify their line-up's styling. I think the best thing Chrysler Group could do is style the Avenger as they did the original to follow the Viper's theme. This will allow them to appeal to the type that prefers arrow dynamic looking models. Also the interior needs the soft dash materials that can be found in the current minivan line-up. That stuff is very soft and does not look cheap as the hard plastics do currently.
I like the exterior styling; however, I can see your point as well. It appeals only to a particular audience which is more likely to be interested in the Charger. If they intend to compete with only two car divisions, they need to diversify their line-up's styling. I think the best thing Chrysler Group could do is style the Avenger as they did the original to follow the Viper's theme. This will allow them to appeal to the type that prefers arrow dynamic looking models. Also the interior needs the soft dash materials that can be found in the current minivan line-up. That stuff is very soft and does not look cheap as the hard plastics do currently.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
#5
RE: Avenger....what's with that
I actually like the avenger. If this had come out when my Neon was killed, I might have opted for this and been happy until the Challenger came out. I don't like the one that replaced the neon.
#6
RE: Avenger....what's with that
I don't like the Caliber either. It doesn't fulfill the economy car segment at 32 mpg for the best fuel economy and the Hornet insults me that it will be built by Chery.[:@][:@][:@][:'(][:'(][:'(][:'(][:'(]. When I am buying a Chrysler product, I want a real CHRYSLER PRODUCT not just the badging.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DSkippy
General Dodge Challenger Discussions
12
03-25-2008 05:49 AM
joeyr
Off Topic
3
01-16-2008 09:31 PM
Jeremiah 29:11
Challenger News
0
06-20-2007 04:56 PM