Notices
Off Topic A place to boldly go off topic. Just about anything goes.

Revealed: Official Shots of 2010 Chevrolet Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-20-2008 | 12:41 PM
  #11  
RoswellGrey's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Revealed: Official Shots of 2010 Chevrolet Camaro

Well, after looking at the pics carefully, I've decided that I'd get one, if a rich woman gave it to me or I won it as the prize in a drawing.
Old 07-20-2008 | 02:58 PM
  #12  
kramtrah's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: Bothell, WA
Default RE: Revealed: Official Shots of 2010 Chevrolet Camaro

then sell it to pay the taxes and use the remaining money on something really worth it, like a DODGE CHALLENGER n
Old 07-22-2008 | 07:23 PM
  #13  
Justinec101's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Revealed: Official Shots of 2010 Chevrolet Camaro

The V6 is lighter than the challenger and has 50 more hp. . .

I'd have one if I won the lottery. . . of course I'd have a lot of cars if I won the lottery.
Old 07-22-2008 | 08:43 PM
  #14  
RyanNY's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Revealed: Official Shots of 2010 Chevrolet Camaro

It's alright. I personally prefer the styling of the Challenger.
Old 07-22-2008 | 11:19 PM
  #15  
FAD1's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Revealed: Official Shots of 2010 Chevrolet Camaro

You got to admit though, the Camaro will defeat all aspects of the Challenger, yes even the interior. You cant blame me, I'm a Chevy guy, but I wish Dodge made 300 HP on their SE. Now that the redesigned Mustang is going to be unveiled later this year, I believe a HP war is going to start. What do you all think?
Old 07-23-2008 | 01:32 AM
  #16  
kevin2323's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Revealed: Official Shots of 2010 Chevrolet Camaro

lol the camaro weights 3900 lbs they ot owned they thought the challenger was no competion. THINK AGAIN. Im so glad i owned all those uys on the camaro forum by telling them their car would weigh similar to the challenger.
Old 07-23-2008 | 01:34 AM
  #17  
kevin2323's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Revealed: Official Shots of 2010 Chevrolet Camaro


ORIGINAL: MrKrisSullivan

how about the 3.6 putting out almost 300 horses...jeez that's impresive...ford has a 4.6 doing the samething
Anyone find that at least a little remarkable???
not when the 4.6 is an explorer engine. plus the phoenix engine coming out in 2010 will destroy those v6s.
Old 07-23-2008 | 04:20 AM
  #18  
lear4406's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 1
From: China Grove NC.
Default RE: Revealed: Official Shots of 2010 Chevrolet Camaro

Before I make a decision I will give the Camaro the same respect I gave the Challenger. I'll reserve the comparisons when the actual product hits the street. Apples to apples. Until then its all speculation and arm chair warriors. Bench racing so to say.
Old 07-23-2008 | 06:15 AM
  #19  
LXSRT8's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Revealed: Official Shots of 2010 Chevrolet Camaro


ORIGINAL: MrKrisSullivan

how about the 3.6 putting out almost 300 horses...jeez that's impresive...ford has a 4.6 doing the samething
Anyone find that at least a little remarkable???
Old 07-23-2008 | 06:20 AM
  #20  
LXSRT8's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Revealed: Official Shots of 2010 Chevrolet Camaro

ORIGINAL: MrKrisSullivan

how about the 3.6 putting out almost 300 horses...jeez thats impresive...ford has a 4.6 doing the samething
Anyone find that at least a little remarkable???
I found out that for some reason, I can not have the quote or apostrophe character ANYWHERE in my message or I get a browser error when I Preview it or try to Post it.

Only happens on this board. I tried the exact paragraph that wont work in here on the Charger forum and it was fine.


See next post for more deatils on that.

Now that I figured it out, I can correctly do the post I made above so let me try again:


The Nissan 350Z has a 3.5 Liter engine and it puts out 306 horses with almost the same amount of torque (285) .

It gets that horsepower without "cheating" ie. No Turbo or NOS or whatever.
Just good old technology with such things as 4 valves per cylinder and Variable Intake & Exhaust Timing

I had one until I sold it last year to buy a Charger SRT. Thanks to the torque on that Z , It was the torque that got me hooked to buy the Cherger SRT

I call it my Charger my "4 door Challenger"

Going from that high tech V6 to the 6.1 Hemi has been fun. Fun because when people ask me how much HP, they then ask "how many valves per cylinder"
I reply with 2. One for the Intake and one for the Exhasut and it is a push rod engine. Not overhead valve. That really gets me funny looks






All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:44 PM.