Notices
Off Topic A place to boldly go off topic. Just about anything goes.

Tell Chrysler what you want!

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-02-2008, 05:04 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
JJMPB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Tell Chrysler what you want!

tell them to give us a live axel in the R/T model
Old 04-02-2008, 01:15 PM
  #12  
Super Moderator
 
RLSH700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Tell Chrysler what you want!


ORIGINAL: Yankee

True, but with a measly 210 hp output, its technology is clearly stuck in the 1990s - guess I should have been more specific. Either way, that engine (and the 3.8 V6) are an embarrassment - they need to upgrade them ASAP or dump them entirely (preferably the latter).
Well, I believe you are going to get your wish before long on both. If they were going to upgrade the 3.7L, I don't see why it wouldn't have been upgrade already as they just updated the 4.7L which gets an impressive 300-310hp & 330ft-lbs of tq without using 4 valves per cylinder, VVT, or GDI. If they would upgrade the 3.7L it might produce around 260hp and ~260ft-lbs of tq given the percentage upgrade to the 4.7L. The issue is that I doubt the 3.7L would find much use outside of trucks since it isn't a very high tech or very smooth engine. I've never been found of that engine and that engine is the only reason why I won't buy a used Liberty unless it has a CRD.

The 3.8L on the other hand is a much better engine than what one would think. That engine has a very good reputation and is only suffering from neglect like most of Chrysler's engines from before the merger. The engine produced 215hp & 245ft-lbs back in 2001 and they have been cutting the power for reasons unstated ever since (probably either to encourage people to want to upgrade to the larger 4.0L, or to cut costs, or both). If they would add VCT and bump the compression a bit like GM did with the "High Value" engine, it could be competitive again. I'm a little concern about completely abandoning their current 60 degree V6 since they have an excellent track record for reliability (with the exception of the 2.7L) and I'm worried that replacement engines might fail to be quite as good.

Again I will say I would like to see them use a V6 Hemi utilizing the lower cost of building, the MDS, and output and reliability that the has in its advantage in all applications of the 3.7L and the Wrangler as well as the Dodge LX cars. Would you be satisfied with that or do you think that the idea of a pushrod V6 should be completely abandoned?
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006

College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing

The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChallengerBoi09
Appearance
0
12-27-2008 12:51 PM
73Challenger
General Dodge Challenger Discussions
15
09-13-2008 12:54 PM
Justinec101
General Dodge Challenger Discussions
51
02-15-2008 06:49 AM
bored out
General Dodge Challenger Discussions
58
08-03-2007 12:32 PM
Jeremiah 29:11
Off Topic
8
05-19-2007 01:11 PM



Quick Reply: Tell Chrysler what you want!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:42 PM.