INTERIOR PICS!!
ORIGINAL: Overpowered
..........
Now for nit-picking -
Look at those cheap-ass pedals - I think they could have designed/implemented nice metal/sporty pedals. Dodge must have purchased several hundred million of these design so they have to use them in "every" vehicle they ever build.
Eric
..........
Now for nit-picking -
Look at those cheap-ass pedals - I think they could have designed/implemented nice metal/sporty pedals. Dodge must have purchased several hundred million of these design so they have to use them in "every" vehicle they ever build.
Eric
Thanks, Axel, for the Camaro interior spy pic. It makes me feel better about the Challenger's interior!
I'm one of the few on this board that thinks the new Camaro looks pretty good, but it can't hold a candle to the Challenger. I think somebody at GM missed the memo that this round of muscle cars is all about retro. The Camaro looks too new.
The one thing I didn't like about the Camaro concept was the hideous interior, and it looks like they haven't done much to improve it.
When I compare the side-by-side interior shots posted in this thread by Justinec101 (see page 4), I realize the difference I'm feeling with the various cars. The Mustang got the interior right, with regards to retro. The Challenger's interior is really nice, but it doesn't look retro, nor does it look like a muscle car. Am I the only one who thinks steering wheel radio controls look as natural on a muscle car as a luggage rack? [:'(]
The Camaro interior looks TOO retro, if that's possible. It also looks a little cobbled together to me. At least they got the three spoke wheel right.
ORIGINAL: WhiteHeat
Am I the only one who thinks steering wheel radio controls look as natural on a muscle car as a luggage rack? [:'(]
Am I the only one who thinks steering wheel radio controls look as natural on a muscle car as a luggage rack? [:'(]

[IMG]local://upfiles/748/A62DD46CB68B4F0389164E611EB3FC1B.jpg[/IMG]
Or this?

[IMG]local://upfiles/748/B3DA0B9F6B1F4418A40065CC3A7A01DC.jpg[/IMG]
I'm pretty happy with the interior. Prefer it to my GT500 quite a bit. I'd like to see anoptional $395 performance guage package with a two gauge cluster (oil/volts) above the center air vents in the R/T and SRT and a bit more brushed metal surrounds in future years. Pistol grip shifters will be available aftermarket as will a bunch of billet pieces. Chrysler is in a struggle to survive. I support a bit of parts bin sharing to keep costs down and keep the car affordable.
I like the interior. The blue-back lighting looks nice! and it has a Tac. As far as it being a Charger rip-off..If they are going to use interior parts from a Charger (something they already have in production), I'm ok with that. It makes sense, it helps keep the cost down, and I'm looking at this car for the performance (6 Speed Manual), and if the interior is a knock off so be it. As someone else posted, you can go to autozone and change yours if need be...
ORIGINAL: mopar2ya
Did you mean like this?
Did you mean like this?


Maybe I shoulda said "...look as natural on a muscle car as wood panelling."
(...nervously awaiting image of "Family Truckster R/T"...)
ORIGINAL: awsure
I do not want costs to be ratcheted down to the point where it looks like crap. I'd rather pay more for a CHALLENGER interior.
I do not want costs to be ratcheted down to the point where it looks like crap. I'd rather pay more for a CHALLENGER interior.


