Convertible Challenger - PICTURE!!!
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Convertible Challenger - PICTURE!!!
I think a retractable hardtop convertible would be an extremely expensive proposition (come on - it's a DODGE, not a BMW...). As long as it doesn't look like Conestoga wagon with the top up, I think a soft top will do just fine - especially considering its target market.
While I would personally never buy a ragtop Challenger, I still think Dodge would be foolish not to make one. Ford has a Mustang convertible, and Chevy is no doubt gonna offer a ragtop Camaro... it's only fitting that Dodge offer a ragtop Challenger. God knows they need a good looking convertible since Chrysler mortifyingly uglified the Sebring last year. [:'(]
While I would personally never buy a ragtop Challenger, I still think Dodge would be foolish not to make one. Ford has a Mustang convertible, and Chevy is no doubt gonna offer a ragtop Camaro... it's only fitting that Dodge offer a ragtop Challenger. God knows they need a good looking convertible since Chrysler mortifyingly uglified the Sebring last year. [:'(]
Super Moderator
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Convertible Challenger - PICTURE!!!
True that.
Boy, did they botch one of the prettiest convertibles they ever offered with the new design.
They need to defenestrate the entire non-LX-platform design team and start over.
They could call it the Ooops-Correction design theme in the vein of the 90's "cab forward" theme.
Boy, did they botch one of the prettiest convertibles they ever offered with the new design.
They need to defenestrate the entire non-LX-platform design team and start over.
They could call it the Ooops-Correction design theme in the vein of the 90's "cab forward" theme.
__________________
º¿º
~) 69.5 SuperBee
º¿º
~) 69.5 SuperBee
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Convertible Challenger - PICTURE!!!
ORIGINAL: Yankee
I think a retractable hardtop convertible would be an extremely expensive proposition (come on - it's a DODGE, not a BMW...). As long as it doesn't look like Conestoga wagon with the top up, I think a soft top will do just fine - especially considering its target market.
While I would personally never buy a ragtop Challenger, I still think Dodge would be foolish not to make one. Ford has a Mustang convertible, and Chevy is no doubt gonna offer a ragtop Camaro... it's only fitting that Dodge offer a ragtop Challenger. God knows they need a good looking convertible since Chrysler mortifyingly uglified the Sebring last year. [:'(]
I think a retractable hardtop convertible would be an extremely expensive proposition (come on - it's a DODGE, not a BMW...). As long as it doesn't look like Conestoga wagon with the top up, I think a soft top will do just fine - especially considering its target market.
While I would personally never buy a ragtop Challenger, I still think Dodge would be foolish not to make one. Ford has a Mustang convertible, and Chevy is no doubt gonna offer a ragtop Camaro... it's only fitting that Dodge offer a ragtop Challenger. God knows they need a good looking convertible since Chrysler mortifyingly uglified the Sebring last year. [:'(]
I was considering it's target market and Chrysler already offers the Sebring as a retractable hardtop convertible which I'm pretty sure are a little cheaper then a BMW. Also, I bet with the shape and design of the roofline and the body,etc. that it would be alot easier to pull off then other cars that have had that option.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
