A muscle car for rich retro-geezers
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Frisco, TX
RE: A muscle car for rich retro-geezers
Roswell,
Thanks for reminding us of the correct name "Challenger" that this fine MOPAR has earned in the 70's and now in the 21st century.
I think the mopars from the 80s (year?) with the name Challenger should have been Challys to avoid embarrassing the name.
I have lazily shortened the name in a few of my postings and have now changed my ways - I apologize for any offense.
Eric
Thanks for reminding us of the correct name "Challenger" that this fine MOPAR has earned in the 70's and now in the 21st century.
I think the mopars from the 80s (year?) with the name Challenger should have been Challys to avoid embarrassing the name.
I have lazily shortened the name in a few of my postings and have now changed my ways - I apologize for any offense.
Eric
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From:
RE: A muscle car for rich retro-geezers
ORIGINAL: RoswellGrey
First of all, the car is a CHALLENGER, not a "Chally." Absolutely NOBODY who had one of the 1970-1974 models EVER drove a "Chally." The new cars cost considerably more than the original models, so please give the new cars the respect they, too, deserve. Also, this is America, not England. We watch televisions and drive Challengers, not "tellys" and "Challys." 
Seriously, the concern over the weight arises from its affect on performance. A heavier car, logically, can't run as fast as a lighter car (assuming both have similar engines). In the case of the V-6, which you probably want for gas mileage (in addition to keeping your insurance rates down), the heavier the car, the harder the engine has to work -- which would cut your gas mileage.
ORIGINAL: Cheekie
Hello there Guys,
And can you please tell me why everyone is concerned about the weight of the Chally?
Hello there Guys,
And can you please tell me why everyone is concerned about the weight of the Chally?
Seriously, the concern over the weight arises from its affect on performance. A heavier car, logically, can't run as fast as a lighter car (assuming both have similar engines). In the case of the V-6, which you probably want for gas mileage (in addition to keeping your insurance rates down), the heavier the car, the harder the engine has to work -- which would cut your gas mileage.
Well I'm VERY sorry to insult you.
ALSO, YOU should know I'm NOT from England and I dont watch a TELLY.[sm=badidea.gif] I have seen this god aweful word used in this forum and felt it was perfectly "Legal" [sm=guilty.gif] to use here, but you sure did tell me. [sm=jawdrop.gif]However I will thank you for your answer to my weight question, I completely understand that a heavier car is slower, the concern over milli seconds I would like to know how many of you are going to be taking the Chal [sm=oopssign.gif] oopps sorry Dodge Challenger out to the drag strip?
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,503
Likes: 0
RE: A muscle car for rich retro-geezers
__________________
For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Then you will call upon me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.
For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Then you will call upon me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.
