Notices
General Dodge Challenger Discussions Discuss anything related to the new Dodge Challenger within...

any truth from this?

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-22-2008, 08:41 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Thor77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: any truth from this?

It's easy for me to talk, I'm waiting til 09 anyway, but whatever the issues are, it's better to work them out BEFORE delivering cars to customers. I'd rather wait an extra month for my car, rather than it show up with problems.
Old 05-22-2008, 09:08 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Billionaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: any truth from this?

Chrysler definitely has to make the Challenger problem-free, because if they don't, the bad publicity could be the thing that finally puts them out of business.
Old 05-22-2008, 09:32 AM
  #13  
Super Moderator
 
DSkippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: any truth from this?

Anyone remember engine mount welds on the Ram? They've got too much torque for one car to handle!
__________________
º¿º
~) 69.5 SuperBee

Old 05-22-2008, 09:39 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Cuda340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: any truth from this?

It's hard to believe that Dodge is have problems with the slightly shortened Charger frame that has been used on all SRTs for the past 3 years, especially since the hp remains at 425. If the rumor is true, I am more inclined to believe they are having problems with engines having much higher hp (e.g., Challenger SS 6.4L).

Also, some speciality companies, like HXC Performance are already developing cars with up to 800 hp. HXC wil be touring a 550 hp 'Cuda nationally among the various Dodge dealerships. HXC will be offering a 345, 370, 392, or 426 engine in the 'Cuda. They will come in the following forms: Stage I- all new engine internals, Stage II- Vortech Supercharger, or Stage III- Upgraded Vortech Supercharger with lower compression dished pistons. See:

http://www.hxcperformance.com/
Old 05-22-2008, 06:10 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
mopar2ya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: any truth from this?

I cant buy off on the frame flex rumor.

1) The body would seem to have more rigidity than the Charger by nature of the 4" shorter wheel base and the fact that it is a two door.

2) This issue would have come up in test mules with all the cars that are already running around.

3) They would not continue building hundreds of units knowing there was a problem of such a magnitude.

I call bunk... [sm=rant.gif] ... we now return you to your regularly scheduled broadcast...
Old 06-10-2008, 03:12 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
BootCamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: any truth from this?

There were pinched wires going to the 5speed autostick that were shorting out the tranny (I believe putting it into limp-mode). The problem was found and the fix has been made. Challengers are back in production. Delays were about a day.
Old 06-10-2008, 03:59 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
halsflying's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: any truth from this?


ORIGINAL: MossOnARoc

That doesn't make much sense to me since they're using basically the same LX platform as the Charger and 300, both which have the same set up (HP and Torque)....

Maybe I'm just completely out of it....

Moss


I agree. I'm no engineer, but shorting the LX platforn would make it stronger, less leverage to twist the frame
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RLSH700
Off Topic
5
01-26-2009 08:58 AM
MrKrisSullivan
General Dodge Challenger Discussions
1
03-03-2008 06:41 PM
Caprice SS
Sights N Sounds
76
08-02-2006 06:40 PM
BootCamp
Appearance
1
06-19-2006 09:50 PM
chubbs
New Member Area
9
06-02-2006 02:04 PM



Quick Reply: any truth from this?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:57 PM.