Dodge Challenger Super Stock to Sema!!!
#1
Dodge Challenger Super Stock to Sema!!!
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...cleId=116894#2
The article says Super Sport but other sources say Super Stock. This could be an SRT-8 version
What do you guys think of a Challenger S/S 6.4 with 500 Horse, ha!
Sema is October 31st btw.
The article says Super Sport but other sources say Super Stock. This could be an SRT-8 version
What do you guys think of a Challenger S/S 6.4 with 500 Horse, ha!
Sema is October 31st btw.
#2
RE: Dodge Challenger Super Stock to Sema!!!
http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/...08-challenger/
Better yet, how about a 6.6 ltr. for the Challenger with 550 Horse. Jeez, I'm getting dizzy, loll!
DCX is not going to let Ford or GM out power them, never have!
More good news!
Better yet, how about a 6.6 ltr. for the Challenger with 550 Horse. Jeez, I'm getting dizzy, loll!
DCX is not going to let Ford or GM out power them, never have!
More good news!
#3
RE: Dodge Challenger Super Stock to Sema!!!
'What this means to you: The Nitro Hemi sounds like fun, but we're more interested in the Challenger SS "concept of the concept."'
Um, *yeah*!!!
Wonder what it will look like...
Um, *yeah*!!!
Wonder what it will look like...
#7
RE: Dodge Challenger Super Stock to Sema!!!
I thought we already had a post on this topic. Oh well, just a few things.
1. I find it hard to believe that they will offer an engine just as powerful as the upcoming Viper for a lower price, just doesn't add up. 2. The 6.6L and 7.1L are just rumors for right now.
3. Just because they can get that amount of power out of the engine doesn't mean that the EPA is going to allow it.
4. The 426 HEMI was a 7.0L, not a 7.1L. I know it's nit picky of me, but I had to say it.
1. I find it hard to believe that they will offer an engine just as powerful as the upcoming Viper for a lower price, just doesn't add up. 2. The 6.6L and 7.1L are just rumors for right now.
3. Just because they can get that amount of power out of the engine doesn't mean that the EPA is going to allow it.
4. The 426 HEMI was a 7.0L, not a 7.1L. I know it's nit picky of me, but I had to say it.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
#8
RE: Dodge Challenger Super Stock to Sema!!!
Why wouldn't the EPA allow 500-600 hp? They ALLOWED 550 hp for the Ford GT. I think we will see 500 plus hp in a limited edition Challenger in 2009 or 2010. These are some awesome times as far as the horsepower wars go. Buy now. They won't last long. Some granola munchin' liberal will find some reason to limit a car to 150 hp just like the junk we were offered from 75-85. Remember those boring automotive years? My mother had a 1981 Dodge Omni. I think it had 85 hp. Wow, what a rocket! 0-60 in 35 seconds!
#9
RE: Dodge Challenger Super Stock to Sema!!!
ORIGINAL: wirewilly
Why wouldn't the EPA allow 500-600 hp? They ALLOWED 550 hp for the Ford GT. I think we will see 500 plus hp in a limited edition Challenger in 2009 or 2010. These are some awesome times as far as the horsepower wars go. Buy now. They won't last long. Some granola munchin' liberal will find some reason to limit a car to 150 hp just like the junk we were offered from 75-85. Remember those boring automotive years? My mother had a 1981 Dodge Omni. I think it had 85 hp. Wow, what a rocket! 0-60 in 35 seconds!
Why wouldn't the EPA allow 500-600 hp? They ALLOWED 550 hp for the Ford GT. I think we will see 500 plus hp in a limited edition Challenger in 2009 or 2010. These are some awesome times as far as the horsepower wars go. Buy now. They won't last long. Some granola munchin' liberal will find some reason to limit a car to 150 hp just like the junk we were offered from 75-85. Remember those boring automotive years? My mother had a 1981 Dodge Omni. I think it had 85 hp. Wow, what a rocket! 0-60 in 35 seconds!
Emission standards. The HEMI designed engines naturally have trouble passing emission standards as it is. The more power you pump out of smaller displacement, normally the worse the emissions are. The 5.4L probably is better in passing the emissions test since it is higher tech engine. I'm not sure about which is more difficult to pass the emission standards, old fashion (but better in my bias opinion) engine designs with higher compression or forced air induction.
Some of this is already happening to a degree with diesels. The stricter environmental regulations are forcing the manufactures to offer larger displacement so then they can pass the emissions tests. I'm not a fan of the increases that have been added.
Wow, what a rocket! 0-60 in 35 seconds!
I'm not sure if you were aware of this or not, but not Omnis were slow and boring. The Omni GLH (Goes Like H#!!) was pretty good as was the Shelby GLHS. Here is a link about the Shelby. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_GLHS Granted it was no 426 HEMI powered Challenger, but still respectable.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeremiah 29:11
Challenger News
6
03-08-2007 04:56 PM
Jeremiah 29:11
Challenger News
16
11-19-2006 09:18 PM