Interesting Proposition
ORIGINAL: MrKrisSullivan
yep just got off car and driver. guess what 4.8. SO EDMUNDS / MOTOR-TREND/ CAR AND DRIVER/. All put the GTO at lower than 4.9. None give the Charger anything under 5. Peace...
yep just got off car and driver. guess what 4.8. SO EDMUNDS / MOTOR-TREND/ CAR AND DRIVER/. All put the GTO at lower than 4.9. None give the Charger anything under 5. Peace...
Now on to your point about not seeing the Charger under 5 secs. I'm going to provide you with multiple links demonstrating that this is possible with LX based sedans. http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...c_srt8_feature
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...srt8_road_test
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...63_amg_feature
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...e+page-11.html
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ecs_price.html
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....&page_number=1
There are other articles from these outlets that I have read before, but the problem is their sites are kind of tricky and I don't think they have all of their old articles listed on the site.
I ignore Edmunds because they tend to get much slower results more often than not, plus I still don't consider them to be a true automotive outlet on the scale of MT, C&D, and R&T. Their writing style as well demonstrates a bias worse than the other outlets, plus they practically plagiarize on some of their "jokes" and the sad part is they aren't even funny.
The interior is of good quality on the GTO, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and I for one prefer the SRT's interior to the GTOs. A person is not silly if they prefer one or the other, it is a matter of taste and opinion, just as it is my opinion that the GTO is very lacking in its exterior styling. There isn't a right or wrong in this situation, it is simply a matter of taste. If the GTO is what you want, then go ahead and get one and I'm sure you will be happy with your experience, but just understand that the GTO will probably not be faster than a Challenger.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
And im not using any articles...im speaking from the point of rule world testing. while there hasnt been much done on the challenger, ive seen plenty of gtos on the track, and we have one member here who spoke about his ls2 auto gto...i think that he ran 13.60s stock, and ive seen similar cars in excellent conditions get into the lower 12s.. the SLOWEST srt8 sedan ive seen in person ran 13.40s...granted, a well driven manual ls2 gto will be faster, but you make it sound like the GTO is proven to be leaps and bounds faster than the 6.1 vehicles, and that is only true in comparison to the jeep.
__________________


ORIGINAL: 1 Bad Mirada
And im not using any articles...im speaking from the point of rule world testing. while there hasnt been much done on the challenger, ive seen plenty of gtos on the track, and we have one member here who spoke about his ls2 auto gto...i think that he ran 13.60s stock, and ive seen similar cars in excellent conditions get into the lower 12s.. the SLOWEST srt8 sedan ive seen in person ran 13.40s...granted, a well driven manual ls2 gto will be faster, but you make it sound like the GTO is proven to be leaps and bounds faster than the 6.1 vehicles, and that is only true in comparison to the jeep.
And im not using any articles...im speaking from the point of rule world testing. while there hasnt been much done on the challenger, ive seen plenty of gtos on the track, and we have one member here who spoke about his ls2 auto gto...i think that he ran 13.60s stock, and ive seen similar cars in excellent conditions get into the lower 12s.. the SLOWEST srt8 sedan ive seen in person ran 13.40s...granted, a well driven manual ls2 gto will be faster, but you make it sound like the GTO is proven to be leaps and bounds faster than the 6.1 vehicles, and that is only true in comparison to the jeep.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
Jeremiah...I for one do like both the Challenger / 70's Muscle Car style and the general Pontiac Grand Am / Grand Prix / GTO / G8 style. I've had a Grand Am GT for the last 8 years and I plan to get a Challenger next, however I am also considering the G8 seriously. I like each of the styles for what each represents. I can't say I really like one over the other. The muscle car has more tradition and that plays into style, but those Dodge's sure are behemoths on the road. A G8 is the size of a Charger, but doesn't look it to me. I would think there are many others out there that like both styles. I'm not sure how old you are, but it might be a generational thing. I'm 28.
ORIGINAL: Jeremiah 29:11
MrKrisSullivan, if the car below is the look you are talking about, I just don't get it. It is so different from the Challenger and more like a Camaro but then again they were cousins. It is certainly more futuristic looking and not retro enough but then you maybe younger and like that look.
Most people like one over the other but not both like you do.
I hope you enjoy whatever you get. For me it is the Challenger since I used to own one.
I guess it is kinda like I prefer brunettes but I married a blonde. Go figure?
[IMG]local://upfiles/17/FB09D93A25764F0C909EB3583B7D2520.jpg[/IMG]
But in the same sense I like to simple clean style of a GTO, I like that it's more of a sophisticated look one that won't wear out in 5 or 6 years maybe.
Most people like one over the other but not both like you do.
I hope you enjoy whatever you get. For me it is the Challenger since I used to own one.
I guess it is kinda like I prefer brunettes but I married a blonde. Go figure?

[IMG]local://upfiles/17/FB09D93A25764F0C909EB3583B7D2520.jpg[/IMG]
Back to topic
I wonder about buying an SE with a 5.7, stripped of options, buy a chrome flip top fuel door, the dual exhaust valence and dual exhausts and make a RT/SE..no spoiler, reduced options = reduced weight, one of a kind factory build?????
Steve
I wonder about buying an SE with a 5.7, stripped of options, buy a chrome flip top fuel door, the dual exhaust valence and dual exhausts and make a RT/SE..no spoiler, reduced options = reduced weight, one of a kind factory build?????
Steve
Steve, would that be like a VSE (if SE is for special edition the v would be "Very" Special Edition")
The econo-street fighter...man, that'd be sweet.
Or heck, offer a limited edition 5.7 in an Avenger (after making it look better StormTrooper would be fine)...now you're talking!
The econo-street fighter...man, that'd be sweet.
Or heck, offer a limited edition 5.7 in an Avenger (after making it look better StormTrooper would be fine)...now you're talking!
__________________
º¿º
~) 69.5 SuperBee
º¿º
~) 69.5 SuperBee
what options would you not get?
the problem is that you really cant buy a "Stripper car" anymore. when my dad worked for dodge in the 60s and 70s, he remembers cars coming in that were truly stripper cars..no back seat..no trunk linings.no radios, etc...but now, the "options" that you can get on the more powerful cars, which can be excluded on the base models arent enough weight to be worth the trouble.
the problem is that you really cant buy a "Stripper car" anymore. when my dad worked for dodge in the 60s and 70s, he remembers cars coming in that were truly stripper cars..no back seat..no trunk linings.no radios, etc...but now, the "options" that you can get on the more powerful cars, which can be excluded on the base models arent enough weight to be worth the trouble.
__________________




