R/T 1/4 mile & 0-60 times
#22
RE: R/T 1/4 mile & 0-60 times
ORIGINAL: Thor77
No more of this defeatist thinking You will smoke mustangs all day long because they will be gawking at your car and you will be watching the light
No more of this defeatist thinking You will smoke mustangs all day long because they will be gawking at your car and you will be watching the light
#23
RE: R/T 1/4 mile & 0-60 times
Sheesh guys... 375 ponies with the stick and 370 with the auto. I believe that says it all. Break them in and then proceede to break some GT pride. I think you guys need to drive more and read less. I will not have any fear of a GT and look forward to the little pony decals on the side of my fighter
#26
#28
RE: R/T 1/4 mile & 0-60 times
ORIGINAL: Thor77
No more of this defeatist thinking You will smoke mustangs all day long because they will be gawking at your car and you will be watching the light
No more of this defeatist thinking You will smoke mustangs all day long because they will be gawking at your car and you will be watching the light
#30
RE: R/T 1/4 mile & 0-60 times
I absolutely could not (respectfully) disagree with you more! Camaros interior is almost an exact match of the 2006 concept. Challener can't say the same. Furthermore, it does a much better job matching the exterior WOW factor of teh car than Challenger does. Challengers interior is a mix & match from the 300C and Charger parts bin. Everything in Camaro is brand new, state of the art stuff.
ORIGINAL: 73Challenger
I am satisfied with the R/T performance numbers. What's more satisfying is the MPG numbers for a muscle car.
IMO, the interior of the new Camaro is weird. I think the straightforward layout of the new Challenger is far more pleasing to the eye.
I am satisfied with the R/T performance numbers. What's more satisfying is the MPG numbers for a muscle car.
IMO, the interior of the new Camaro is weird. I think the straightforward layout of the new Challenger is far more pleasing to the eye.