Now That Should be against the law!!
I personally think it looks awesome. I wish they would call it a Coronet instead of the Charger, but it is still a nice car and I was planning on getting one before I heard and saw about the Challenger concept.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
Well, so do I but, I can't really do anything about that. So I just got adjusted to it.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
Top dog should still be the R/T, just as it always was. Make a T/A with the 6.1; the R/T should be the 6.4. Course, that ain'tgonna happen with the DCX way of running things, 'cuz there's no SRT whatever..... and they think that should be the top of the heap!
I really don't have a problem with using the SRT badging. I would prefer to have the 6.4L HEMI as the R/T. I believe if a car is going to have the SRT badge it should have forced air induction, but I'm more concerned about having the engine offered, and not what the trim level badge is.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trev0006
Off Topic
1
Jan 11, 2009 10:03 AM
DSkippy
Challenger News
0
May 6, 2008 07:57 PM
Jeremiah 29:11
Off Topic
8
Feb 27, 2008 09:41 PM




