Top Gear Review
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Top Gear Review
May 6, 2008 Top Gear Review of 2008 SRT Challenger:
"Just got back home after driving the SRT-8 Challenger at Willow Springs Raceway and I've got a few things to add to the story you'll see in the May's Top gear magazine.
When I wrote that, we had only had a relatively sedate drive in the car, which was more of a pre-production model.
Now I've had an unlimited blast in the later SRT-8 Challenger on the canyons above LA and on this old, fast raceway, I've got to know the car a lot better and, it's fair to say, I like it.
It's not perfect - the seats are too short to support your thighs properly, and you could lose a country in the gap between second and third gears - but other than some other very minor grumbles, it goes like a train. I even got to like the interior, which isn't fabulously authentic but screwed together so well, it feels like it'll last. That's progress.
But the really write-home point that quickly became clear yesterday was just how well this car handles at all speeds. Yes, it's got some slack in the suspension to mop up bumps on the road, but once it's settled, you can steer just as much with the throttle as you can with the wheel.
Not in the guns 'n' glory style of the cart-sprung Mustang, but in a way that's not apparent in any other muscle car I've ever driven. I was expecting it to be all show and then get badly out of shape at the track. That just didn't happen.
We were hitting almost 130mph on the entrance to the monstrous Turn 8, but the 4,000lb+ Challenger was happy to take the abuse for as long as we cared to hand it out. If you tried to do that in most production Mustangs, they'd still be picking up the pieces in a year. It's not that the Mustang's not huge fun - it is. It's just that the Challenger is miles better.
This isn't down to expensive components, even though it does have independent rear suspension and some big-name bits like the Brembo brakes and Goodyear F1 tyres. It's how the engineers have tuned it all that really makes the difference. The bits we never talk about, like the bushings and the springs and the aerodynamics.
And the people. The SRT-8 Challenger chassis was developed by a team led by Erich Heuschele. Erich is clearly petrol-powered and was probably an engine in a previous life. The way he describes how he got this big, heavy car to top 170mph and corner like something half the size and weight is like listening to your best mate describing a big night out.
The Challenger reeks of that kind of enthusiasm, which inspires you to enjoy it not just on the outside for the killer looks, but also the inside too, where it counts. No question, this is the new benchmark muscle car."
"Just got back home after driving the SRT-8 Challenger at Willow Springs Raceway and I've got a few things to add to the story you'll see in the May's Top gear magazine.
When I wrote that, we had only had a relatively sedate drive in the car, which was more of a pre-production model.
Now I've had an unlimited blast in the later SRT-8 Challenger on the canyons above LA and on this old, fast raceway, I've got to know the car a lot better and, it's fair to say, I like it.
It's not perfect - the seats are too short to support your thighs properly, and you could lose a country in the gap between second and third gears - but other than some other very minor grumbles, it goes like a train. I even got to like the interior, which isn't fabulously authentic but screwed together so well, it feels like it'll last. That's progress.
But the really write-home point that quickly became clear yesterday was just how well this car handles at all speeds. Yes, it's got some slack in the suspension to mop up bumps on the road, but once it's settled, you can steer just as much with the throttle as you can with the wheel.
Not in the guns 'n' glory style of the cart-sprung Mustang, but in a way that's not apparent in any other muscle car I've ever driven. I was expecting it to be all show and then get badly out of shape at the track. That just didn't happen.
We were hitting almost 130mph on the entrance to the monstrous Turn 8, but the 4,000lb+ Challenger was happy to take the abuse for as long as we cared to hand it out. If you tried to do that in most production Mustangs, they'd still be picking up the pieces in a year. It's not that the Mustang's not huge fun - it is. It's just that the Challenger is miles better.
This isn't down to expensive components, even though it does have independent rear suspension and some big-name bits like the Brembo brakes and Goodyear F1 tyres. It's how the engineers have tuned it all that really makes the difference. The bits we never talk about, like the bushings and the springs and the aerodynamics.
And the people. The SRT-8 Challenger chassis was developed by a team led by Erich Heuschele. Erich is clearly petrol-powered and was probably an engine in a previous life. The way he describes how he got this big, heavy car to top 170mph and corner like something half the size and weight is like listening to your best mate describing a big night out.
The Challenger reeks of that kind of enthusiasm, which inspires you to enjoy it not just on the outside for the killer looks, but also the inside too, where it counts. No question, this is the new benchmark muscle car."
#3
Senior Member
RE: Top Gear Review
After reading reviews for the Month of may, I have to say they have all been positive. I have'nt read a bad one yet and for all the gloom and doom guys who have been complaining from just shear speculation. Here it is in print from many diverse automotive platforms and your silence has shown that you really should learn patience and hard facts first and foremost. So we have learned to wait and let the reviewers do their deal before we jump the gun with baseless complaints.
#4
RE: Top Gear Review
We were hitting almost 130mph on the entrance to the monstrous Turn 8, but the 4,000lb+ Challenger was happy to take the abuse for as long as we cared to hand it out. If you tried to do that in most production Mustangs, they'd still be picking up the pieces in a year. It's not that the Mustang's not huge fun - it is. It's just that the Challenger is miles better.
It's not that the Mustang's not huge fun - it is. It's just that the Challenger is miles better.
ahhhh
It's not that the Mustang's not huge fun - it is. It's just that the Challenger is miles better.
yeahhhhh
So we have learned to wait and let the reviewers do their deal before we jump the gun with baseless complaints.
A master tailor can take the same wool fabric a sweatshop takes and create a work of art in lieu of an "off the rack" suit and it sounds like the SRT team did just that. I'm not implying that the R/T will not be as inspirational, I am comparing this mopar product to the producers of non-mopar cars.
__________________
şżş
~) 69.5 SuperBee
şżş
~) 69.5 SuperBee
#6
RE: Top Gear Review
ORIGINAL: lear4406
After reading reviews for the Month of may, I have to say they have all been positive. I have'nt read a bad one yet and for all the gloom and doom guys who have been complaining from just shear speculation. Here it is in print from many diverse automotive platforms and your silence has shown that you really should learn patience and hard facts first and foremost. So we have learned to wait and let the reviewers do their deal before we jump the gun with baseless complaints.
After reading reviews for the Month of may, I have to say they have all been positive. I have'nt read a bad one yet and for all the gloom and doom guys who have been complaining from just shear speculation. Here it is in print from many diverse automotive platforms and your silence has shown that you really should learn patience and hard facts first and foremost. So we have learned to wait and let the reviewers do their deal before we jump the gun with baseless complaints.
JJMPB, I'm expecting few difference and expect that the R/T will receive positive press as well. Dodge would not make the SRT as close to perfect as possible, then let the R/T turn to junk as they need the sales of the R/T. It won't be as good as the SRT, but it will still be good.
What is also interesting is this outlet hated the 300C SRT-8, and yet they like the Challenger. This is a good sign.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
#7
RE: Top Gear Review
I am sure I will strike a nerve here, but for the same reason the best college team voted on by peoples opinion is also the same reason I do not like magazine reviews on a car they have not drove yet.
I like real playoffs for football like the Superbowl and not peoples opinions. I want a real test drive not somebodies opinion of what they think it will do.
The proof is in the pudding. You gotta taste the pudding not describe what it looks like to really enjoy the pudding.
I like real playoffs for football like the Superbowl and not peoples opinions. I want a real test drive not somebodies opinion of what they think it will do.
The proof is in the pudding. You gotta taste the pudding not describe what it looks like to really enjoy the pudding.
__________________
For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Then you will call upon me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.
For I know the plans I have for you," declares the LORD, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. Then you will call upon me and come and pray to me, and I will listen to you. You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.
#8
RE: Top Gear Review
ORIGINAL: Jeremiah 29:11
I am sure I will strike a nerve here, but for the same reason the best college team voted on by peoples opinion is also the same reason I do not like magazine reviews on a car they have not drove yet.
I like real playoffs for football like the Superbowl and not peoples opinions. I want a real test drive not somebodies opinion of what they think it will do.
The proof is in the pudding. You gotta taste the pudding not describe what it looks like to really enjoy the pudding.
I am sure I will strike a nerve here, but for the same reason the best college team voted on by peoples opinion is also the same reason I do not like magazine reviews on a car they have not drove yet.
I like real playoffs for football like the Superbowl and not peoples opinions. I want a real test drive not somebodies opinion of what they think it will do.
The proof is in the pudding. You gotta taste the pudding not describe what it looks like to really enjoy the pudding.
LOL! I like your analogy with the pudding.
__________________
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006
College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing
The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post